Henry Vs. Henkel - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-30-1914

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Constitution, Section 1014, the Constitution contemplates

PERSON: Henry v. Henkel -, Henry v. Henkel, Ex Parte Royall, George G. Henry, Lewisohn Brothers, Henry, Stat, Revised Statutes, Thereupon Henry, Kilbourn, Greene, Beavers v. Henkel, Tinsley v. Treat, Kaizo, Glasgow, Ex Parte Simon, Johnson, Urquhart v. Brown, Hyde v. Shine, Riggins, Royall, Greene v. Henkel

CARDINAL: 235, 216, 207, 224, 504, one, 15, 183, 752, 18, 163, 179, 579, 125, 697

GPE: U.S., NEW YORK, New York, California, Chicago, Detroit, the District of Columbia, the United States, Virginia, MR

DATE: 1914, February 24, 25, November 30, 1914, H.R. 429, 103 U. S. 168, 194 U. S. 73, 155 U. S. 89

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Court, Congress, the House of Representatives, Salamon & Company, Hallgarten & Company, House, Chapman, Thompson, Senate, Ex Parte Lange, Gregory, McREYNOLDS

ORDINAL: 62nd, fourth, first

MONEY: 8,215,262, 22,500,000, nearly $500,000

PERCENT: 12 1/2 percent, 166 U. S. 668, 134 U. S. 372, 199 U. S. 63, 199 U. S. 551, 121 U. S. 104

NORP: §

EVENT: the Fourth Amendment

PRODUCT: 104