Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Smoot Vs. Heyl

Decided On : Feb-24-1913

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Heyl No., the Building Regulations

GPE: Smoot, U.S., U.S., Smoot, U.S., the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia, Twentieth, the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia, Washington, the City of Washington, the Federal City, the United States, United States, Washington

ORG: Heyl - 227, U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Court, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, Congress, Court, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, Court, the Court of Appeals, Court, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, Court, Northwest, the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, Congress, Congress, Court, Denver & Rio Grande R. Co., Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. Hopkins, Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co., the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals Page 227 U. S. 524 , SEC, The Inspector of Buildings

CARDINAL: 227, 86, 227, 250, Twenty-first, three, approximately one-half, 34, 20, 131, 1, 31, 168, 2, 62, 1, one

DATE: December 13, 16, 1912, February 24, 1913, 1911, 1878, June 14, 1878, c. 194, October 17, 1791, 62, March 3, 1901, 1189, 1227, 203 U. S. 38, October 17, 1791

PERSON: D.C. 480, D.C. 480, c. 854, Steinmetz v. Allen, McLean, Horner, Austin

FAC: Wyoming Avenue

QUANTITY: forty feet, about three feet, about forty feet, About five feet, about eight feet, eight feet, three feet

ORDINAL: first, fourth, first

LOC: District, District

TIME: 233, Act

PERCENT: 168 U. S. 685

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //