Shulthis Vs. Mcdougal - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-07-1912

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Section 6 of the Act of March 3, 1891, Constitution

GPE: U.S., the United States, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Atchison, Kansas, United States, Muskogee, St. Louis, Tennessee, Los Angeles

DATE: 1912, January 23, 24, June 7, 1912, February 18, 1901, 1891, May, 1901, November, October, 1902, March, 1906, fifteen years, March 21, 1906, April 19, 1907, the first day of April, 1907, March 1, 1901, June 30, 1902, 1323, April 26, 1906, c. 1876

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, the Indian Territory, Congress, Territory, Kansas Pacific R. Co., Topeka & Santa Fe R. Co., the Circuit Court, the Creek Nation, the United States Appeals, Court, the Circuit Court of Appeals, the Eighth Circuit, the Kiefer Oil & Gas Company, Commission, the Five Civilized Tribes, Interior, Kiefer Oil & Gas Company, Louisville &c.; Co., K. C. & C. R. Co., Wabash R. Co., Colorado Central Mining Co., Turck, Union & Planters' Bank, Duplan Silk Co., Devine, Hanford v. Davies, Mountain View Mining Co., McFadden, Bankers' Casualty Co., Minneapolis &c.; Co., Keyes, Portland Gold Mining Co., Florida Central & P. Railroad Co., Bell, Shoshone Mining Co., Nevada Co., the Kiefer Oil Page, Osborn v. Bank of United States, Pacific Railroad Removal Cases, Kansas Pacific Railroad Co., Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Co.

PERSON: McDougal, VAN DEVANTER, George Franklin Berryhill, Andrew J. Berryhill, Andrew J.,, Rouse, Gregory, Pope, Spencer, Little York Gold-Washing & Water Co., Blackburn, De Lamar's, Nesbitt

CARDINAL: 225, 156, 157, 31, 794, 379, 170, 565, One, 162, 95, 615, 26, 828, 569, 1, 2, 3, one, 96, 199, 861, 676, 32, 500, 34, 137, 22, 738

WORK_OF_ART: McDougal

LOC: the Eastern District

NORP: Indian

MONEY: 2,000, 25,000

ORDINAL: first

PERCENT: 173 U. S. 573, 150 U. S. 138, 191 U. S. 526, 163 U. S. 273, 180 U. S. 533, 192 U. S. 371, 212 U. S. 374

PRODUCT: 9 Wheat