Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Decided On : Mar-01-2010

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Sections 65 and 66(1, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Sections 65, the Information Technology Act, Act 10 of 2009, the Indian Penal Code, Section 66(1, Section 66, the Information Technology Act, Act 10 of 2009, Section 66, the Companies Act, Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 438, Section 438, Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Sections 82, Section 438, Section 438, Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

PERSON: Sankaran, K.A. Koshy, Serena, Patiala, Mohan Varghese @, Charanjeet Singh @ Channi, Sam, Samdeep Mohan Varghese, Samdeep Mohan Varghese, K.A. Koshy, K.A. Koshy, Krishna Hospital, K.A. Koshy, Serena, Samdeep Mohan Varghese, Samdeep, Samdeep.8, Heard Sri, P. Vijaya Bhanu, Sri, Ramakumar, Advocate Sri, Vineeth Malhotra, Sri, K. Ramakumar, Sri, Ramakumar, Sri, Ramakumar, Sri, Vineeth Malhotra, Sri, Ramakumar, Joginder @ Jindi v. State, KHC, Rajeevan, KHC, Sri, Pawan Kumar, Samdeep Mohan Varghese, Sri, Sareen Daughter, 21.2.2010, go.14, Sri, KHC 471, Salauddin Abdulsamd Shaikh, Rajeevan, KHC, Sri, Ramakumar, C.I. Mathew v. Government, Bhaskaran Nambiar, Mohan v. State of, Rajpura, Ernakulam, Ernakulam, Ernakulam, Ernakulam, Rajpura, Order, Ernakulam

NORP: J.1, Punjab, Pediatrician, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Bharat, Punjab, Shree, Punjab

CARDINAL: two, 30, 30, 2, 419, 420, 419, 420, 1, 3, 2, 66, 420, 2, 1, one, 30, 2010.7, 21.6.2009, 1.7.2009, 934, 1, 3, two, 4, 294, 4, 98, 4, 70, two, 19.2.2010, 5.2.2010, 2, 19.2.2010, 3, 8, 3, 576, 3, 1, 4, 98, 4, 83, 942, two, 71, 2, 83, 9, 414, 30, 30, 25,000/-, two

ORG: Rajpura City Police Station, Annexure A First Information Report, the Information Technology Act, Additional Advocate General, the Bail Application, the Bail Application, Public Prosecutor, Rajpura City Police Station, the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, Sections 419, the Bail Application, the Bail Application, the Information Technology Act, M/s Jay Polychem, Corporate Office, Company, Directors, Company, Company, Preeti, Company, Company, Directors, Company, Company, Cochin and Munnar, Company, Company, Company, Directors, Company, The First Information Report, Anesthetist, Lakshmi Hospital, Lakshmi Hospital, Jay Polychem India Ltd., the Punjab Police, the Police Personnel, Crl, Additional Advocate General, S.I. of Police, Rajpura City Police Station, Patiala District, Public Prosecutor, the Bail Application, the Bail Application, the Supreme Court, SC, the Sub Inspector of Police, Rajpura City Police Station, the Judicial Magistrate, R2(b, Additional Advocate General, the Bail Application, the First Information Report, R2(b, Magistrate, Mariama R/o, Lakhsmi Hospital, Court, Vijayabhanu, the Bail Application, Bail Application, Court, Additional Advocate General, the Bail Application, The Bail Application, the Bail Application, Bail Application, the Case Diary, Bail Application, Case Diary, Bail Application, the B ail Application, the Bail Application, Court, KLT 956, SC, the Supreme Court, the Court of Session, Court, the High Court, Bharat Chaudhary's, Bharat Chaudhary's, the Sessions Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, the Bail Application, the High Court, High Court, the High Court, the Sessions Court, Magistrate, bail,-, the High Court, Sessions Court, State, State, the High Court, State, Haryana High Court, LJ, Court, Mathew v. Government of India, KLT 942.21, the Court of Session, the High Court, Court, the Bail Application, the Bail Application, Court, Court, Bail Application, The Bail Application, the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rajpura City Police Station, Rajpura City Police Station, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Court, Registry, the Chief Judicial Magistrate

GPE: Patjala District, New Delhi, India, Cochin, Singh, Singh, Divans Road, Ernakulam, Krishna Hospital, Divans Road, Ernakulam, Kerala, Kerala, the State of Kerala, Kerala, KLT, Singh, Rahul, Rajpura, Patiala District, Singapore, abscond.12, Counsel, Cr, P.C., Vineeth Somarajan, Kerala, KLT, Vineeth Somarajan's, Kerala, KLT, Cr, P.C., KLT, bail.12, Madhusoodanan, C.I., Ernakulam, the State of Kerala, the State of Kerala, Ernakulam

DATE: 2000, a period of, two weeks, 2008, 1973, three years, three years, 1956, 30.11.2009, 5.2.2010 as F.I.R., 2010, 2010, 2008, 2008, 2003, 2003, 2009, 2009, 1996, 2008, 2008, 70, 1984, 1984, 1984, 2009, a period of, two months, today, a period of, two months, two months

PRODUCT: Section 77B of the Information Technology Act, Bench

ORDINAL: third, first, second, 2nd, second, first, first, first, first

WORK_OF_ART: Samdeep Mohan Varghese

FAC: Ground 3, an Indian Passport