Estes Vs. Timmons - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-27-1905

Court: US Supreme Court

CARDINAL: 199, 392, 12, 537, 27, 989, One, one, 20, 6, 18, 43, 22, 193, 2, Five

GPE: U.S., the County of Pottawatomie, Oklahoma, the United States, Oklahoma City, Eaton, Kentucky, Arkansas, United States, Throckmorton

DATE: 1905, November 10, 1905, November 27, 1905, the south half of the southeast quarter, September 22, 1891, September 18, 1891, September 22, the twenty-fifth of September, the fifth of July, 1892, May 21, 1894, the twenty-sixth of September, 1894, 1891, A.D. 1891, September 18, the twenty-second day of September, 1891, the twenty-second of September, March 4, 1899, July, 1892, 1894, June 10, 1898, September 12, the twenty-ninth, October 28, January 27, 1899, October 12, 1898, July, 1891, 98 U. S. 61

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF, Syllabus, the Land Department, Court, the supreme court, Fox Reservation, the General Land Office, Interior

PERSON: McKENNA, Bill, Appellee, appellee, W. L. Hartman, Clarence Hartman, Sam Cole, David L. Timmons, John Eaton, H. W. Darrow, George Stratton, Stratton, Garland v. Wynn, Barnard v. Ashley, Lytle, Lindsey v. Hawes, Carr, De Cambra v. Rogers, Eaton, Vance v. Burbank, Lee v. Johnson

TIME: 12 o'clock noon, noon

LOC: the Town of Wewoka

PERCENT: 156 U. S. 494, 189 U. S. 119, 101 U. S. 514, 114 U. S. 233, 116 U. S. 48

PRODUCT: Rule 24