Skip to content

Thayer Vs. Spratt - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Apr-06-1903

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: section 32, the Timber Act, section 2 of the Timber Act of 1878

PERSON: Thayer v. Spratt - 189, Thayer v. Spratt, Benjamin L. Hennis, Ellis Walker, Frank Smith, JUSTICE BREWER, Hawley v. Diller, Egan, Gardner v. Bonestell, Jenkins

GPE: U.S., Washington Territory, the United States, Cowlitz County, Washington, California, Oregon, Nevada, Vancouver, Alpena, Michigan, the State of Washington, D.C., United States

DATE: 1903, March 12, 1903, April 6, 1903, June 3, 1878, 1878, December, 1898, the southeast quarters, the two quarters, June 25, 1890, May 26, 1883, about six months, March 13, 1884, thirty years, two quarter, the northeast quarter, the southeast quarter, 144 U. S. 154, years, 186 U. S. 70, 186 U. S. 230

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Syllabus, the Land Department, Court, Congress, State, the supreme court, Department, the General Land Office, Department of the Interior, Guaranty Savings Bank, Bement, National Harrow Company, Congress of 1878, the Supreme Court

CARDINAL: 189, 207, transferee, 9, 20, 89, one, quarter, 186

WORK_OF_ART: An Act for the Sale of Timber Lands

MONEY: 800, about $4,400

QUANTITY: 200,000 feet

ORDINAL: first

LOC: New England

PERCENT: 178 U. S. 476, 180 U. S. 362

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //