Minnesota Vs. Brundage - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-18-1901

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the Constitution of the United States, Constitution

GPE: Minnesota, U.S., the United States, Minneapolis, the County of Hennepin, the State of Minnesota, New York, Fitts, Richmond, Virginia, Ohio, Dayton, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Massachusetts

DATE: 1901, February 28, 1901, March 18, 1901, April 19th, 1891, 1899, thirty days, 155 U. S. 89

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Court, the Municipal Court, the State Dairy & Food Department, the Sale of Dairy Products, Adulterated Dairy Products, Preserve the Public Health, Brundage, Congress, Chapman, Iasigi, Baker v. Grice, the House of Representatives of the United States, the Central Branch, the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers, the Supreme Court

CARDINAL: 180, 159, 295, 761, 142, 171, 96, 969

NORP: Prohibit, §

PERSON: Laws, Ex Parte Fonda, Duncan, McElvaine, Brush, Cook, Whitten v. Tomlinson, Van De Carr, Tinsley v. Anderson, Markuson, Boucher, Loney, Boske, Robb v. Connolly, Schollenberger, Collins, Barber, Plumley

MONEY: 25

ORDINAL: first

PERCENT: 155 U. S. 100, 172 U. S. 516, 134 U. S. 372, 155 U. S. 461