Tek Chand Vs. State of H.P. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-19-2009

Court: Himachal Pradesh

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Section 180 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 279, the Indian Penal Code, Section 337, the Indian Penal Code, Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, Section 180, Section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code

GPE: Singh, Bakhrot

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 279, 337, 304, 2, 500/-, 200/-, 500/-, 3., HP-30-0765, two, over one, two, 4, 5, 6, two, 8., two, 9, 10, 11, 2005CriLJ3710, 12, one

ORG: Court, the Sessions Court, Revision Petition, Court, Bakhrot, Chindi, Trial Court, Court, the Sessions Court, Learned Counsel, Court, Chindi, Learned Counsel, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Revision Petition

DATE: three months, three months, six months, one month, 28th February, 1998, one month, 600/- per month

WORK_OF_ART: Truck No, Truck, Truck, Truck

PERSON: Prakash Gupta, Truck, Damu Ram, Bakhrot, Amar Lal, Amar Lal, Putli Devi, Damu Ram, Damu Ram, Amar Lal, Amar Lal, Amar Lal, Amar Lal, Amar Lal, Prakash Gupta, Amar Lal, Damu Ram, Amar Lal, Amar Lal, Damu Ram, Damu Ram, Prakash Gupta, Amar Lal, Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab, Anr

TIME: about three hours

PRODUCT: Truck, PW-14 Putli Devi

QUANTITY: about 100 feet