Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Steel Strips Ltd. Vs. Him Teknoforge Ltd.

Decided On : Sep-02-2002

Court : Himachal Pradesh

LAW: the Companies Act, Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, Negotiable Instruments Act, Rule 9, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Company Petition No. 5 of 2001, the Companies Act, Section 433, the Company Petition No. 5 of 2001, the Company Petition No. 5, the Companies Act, Pun. & Har

PERSON: Arun Kumar Goel, J.1, Jitwal Kalan, Chandigarh, District Solan, Chandigarh, Directors, Chandigarh, p.a., p.a., Anncxurc-III, Gupta, Panchkula, Panchkula, Jatinder Walia9-8-19992.325175, Jasbir Singh27-7-19993.325174, Naval Kumar29-9-, Jatinder Walia9-8-19995.325178, Jatinder Walia9-8-19996.325173 10-1.1999500000.00Sh, Naval Kumar29-9-19997, Jasbir Singh27-7-, R.L. Khurana, Madhya Marg, Sai Road, District Solan, District Dhar, K.D. Sood, R.L. Sood, Dasti Copy, R.L. Khurana, R.K. Garg, Reg, Anncxurc P-XV, K, D. Sood, K.D. Sood, R.L. Sood, R.L. Sood, Saxby Farmer Ltd, Punjab, R.L. Sood, R.L. Sood, Kar, K.D. Sood

ORG: Company Petition No, SAB Industries Limited, Company Petition No., this Company Petition, M/s. Steel Strips Limited, Registered Office, Head Office, SSL, Shri R.K. Garg, Registered Office, Baddi, HP, Administrative Office, HTL, SSL, HTL, HTL, SSL, SSL, HTL, Directors, HTL, Courts of Judicial Magistrate, SSL, HTL, HTL, SSL, HP High Court at Shimla, HTL, SSL, SSL, HTL, SSL, SSL, SSL, Credit Note, HTL, HTL, SSL, HTL, SAB Industries Limited, SSL, SSL, HTL, Rs.)Amount, SSL, P.S.S. Unit, SAB Unit, HTL, HTL93,05,370.00To, HTL, SSL, SSL, I. HTL, State Bank of Patiala, HTL, HTL Company, HTL, HTL, HTL, HTL, HTL, SSL, HTL, SSL, Civil and Criminal, HTL, HTL, Sales Tax Forms, SSL, SAB Industries Ltd., SSL, SAB Industries Ltd., HTL, Sales Tax, SSL, HTL, Directors, H.P, H.P. High Court, Petition District Courts, HTL, TDS, SSL, Non-Deduction Tax Certificate, Deptt, HTL, Tax Deducted, TDS, SSL, the Certificate of Non-Deduction of Tax, HTL, Certificate, SSL, Certificate, TDS Certificate, SSL, HTL, SSL, HTL, HTL, SSL, SSL, HTL, Directors, HTL, Court, SSL, SSL, HTL, the High Court, Himachal Pradesh, SSL, R.K. Garg, M/s. Steel Strips Limited, ChequeNo, the Court of JMIC.ChandigarhNextdate1.325508 4-2-1999194330.00Ms, Order/Judgment/Statement/Passed/Delivered/Recorded, Head Office, Registered Office, Baddi, H.P., Plot No, Industrial Area-I, Usha Nagar Extension, Company's, it.6, Him Teknoforge Ltd., TDS, Kind Attn, Notice under Sections, MOU, TDS, Board of Directors, Khurana, the Company Petition, Company Petition No, Court, the Company Petition, the Company Petition, Section, Company Petition No., Court, Company Petition No, the Company Petition, the Company Petition, M/s. SAB Industries Limited, the Company Petition, Company Petition No., Company Petition No, Company (Court) Rules, SAB Industries, the Company Petition, SAB Industries, the Company Petition, Company Petition No., Calcutta High Court, Surindra Packers v., Punjab Land Development & Reclamation Corpn. Ltd., Haryana High Court, Allahabad High Court, Ema India Ltd., Trackparts of India Ltd., Neptune Inflatables Ltd., National Conduits (P.) Ltd., SC, Madhusudan Gordhandas & Co, Madhu Woollen Industries, SC, American Express Bank Ltd., Core Health Care Ltd., New Swadeshi Mills of, Dye-Chem Corpn, Reliance, Madras High Court, Concrete Construction Ltd., SAB Industries Ltd., the Company Petition, the SAB Industries Ltd., the Company Petition No. 5 of 2001, Bharat Earth Movers Ltd., K. Suresh, Cochin Stock Exchange Ltd., the Company Petition, Reliance, Malhotra Steel Syndicate v. Punjab Chem-Plants Ltd, New Era Mfg. Co. Ltd.

CARDINAL: 5, 1,21,93,169.48, 31-3-1999, 8, 27,82,799, 1,21,93,169.48, 433, 434, 39, 8, 27,28,799, 7, 4/99, 31-3-1999, 15,99,020, 1-4-1999, 31-12-2000, 1, 6,12,648, 1, 1-4-1999, 31-3-1999, 1,25,859.00Debit, 15,99,020.00, 1, to31-12-2000, 20, 20-7-1999, 31-12-2000, 93,05,370, 17, 8, eight, up to, 31-3-2000, 11,25,760, 1,45,410, 31,990, 31,990, 2728799.00, 4/99, 49-50, 019, 1, 39, 264, 167, 4, 4/99, 5/99Interim, 6, 19, 19, 36, 53,00,000, 31,990, 46,537.88, 31, 31-3-2001, 41,58,996, 21, 7,71,659.48, 31-3-2001, 19, 21, 1, 16, 5, 3-12-2001, 7, 3-3-2002, 433, 434, 44,62,856.40, 1, 49, 433, 434, 1956.Dear, 4, 21, 31-12-2000, 31,990, 53.00, 39,73,380.00, 31-3-2001, 5, 1956.11, 7, 8, 1,21,93,169.48, 21, 19, 16, 35, 35, 5, 30, 30, 30, 30, 5, 4, 19, 31-12-1990, 53, 5, 5, 3, 30, 31-12-2002, 19, 53, 16, more than 50, 433, 434, two, 53, 30, 31-12-2002, 52, 479, 66, 883, 106, 700.28, 1, 30, 42, 125, 96, 841, 15, 59, 183, 433, 434, 16, 3, 3, 2, 1965, 30, 31-12-2002, 30, 31-12-2002, 16-4-2002

DATE: 1956, 1999, 21st July, 1991, 49-50, 1994, 1988, 12-7-1999, 1999, 1999, December, 2000, monthly, 1999, monthly, quarterly, one month, 1988, year 2000-2001, the year ending 31-3-2000, April, 2000, the assessment year 2001-2002, the 21st day of July, 1999, 16, 15.1-1999375735.00Sh, 325176, 1999, 4-8-1999, 1999, August 8, 1999, quarterly, 1999, the preceding months, 1999, quarterly, 21 days, 2001, 1959, December, 2002, today, one week, today, 31st December, 2002, 31st December, 2002, April 16,2002.Sd/-R.L., '15, 16th April, 2002, the day to day, 2001, 1999, the day, 1999, 1999, 2001, 1959, 1999, 21-7-1999, 1982, 1989, 2001, 1999, 1968, 2001, 1972, 1999, 1998, 1986, 1963, 1987, 1988, 1989, the first week of January 2003

PRODUCT: P-XVI, 20-1-1999500000.00Sh, P-XV, 279, Comp, 363, 2 CLJ 301, respondent.33, 261

GPE: District Sangrur, HTL, HTL, Teh, Malerkotla, District Sangrur, p.a., S.S., Krishnawami

WORK_OF_ART: 'Exceeds Arrangement', Civil or Criminal Cases against HTL, Vijay Aggarwal)For Him Tcknoforge Limited Managing

ORDINAL: 1st, third, secondly, firstly

MONEY: 18 per cent, 18 per cent, 18 per cent, 18 per cent, 21 per cent, 20 per cent, 21 per cent, 21 per cent

QUANTITY: 10-2-1999392977.00Sh

TIME: 30-1-1999120105.00Ms

NORP: Hon'ble, Punjab, P-XXII, P-XXI

LOC: Coy, Coy, Coy

FAC: Anand Steelv

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //