Vijay Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh

Decided On : Apr-25-1978

Court : Himachal Pradesh

LAW: Section 34, Section 302 and Section 392, Section 34, Section 302, Section 392, Section 34, Section 392, Section 34, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 26, Section 27, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27.42, Section 24, Section 24, Section 25, Section 25, Section 24, Section 25, Section 26, Section 25, Section 26, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 24, Section 25 and Section 26, Section 27, Section 27, Section 25, Section 27, Section 26, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, the Evidence Act, the Indian Evidence Act, Act 1 of 1872, Act 25 of 1861, Section 148, Section 25, the Evidence Act, the Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 146 of the Code of 1861, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 149 of the Code of, Section 26, the Evidence Act, the Section 26 of the Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 150 of the Code, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Act 8 of 1869, Section 150, Section 150, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 27, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 26, Section 27, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 26, Section 25, Section 27, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 24, the Indian Evidence Act.58, Section 27, Section 24, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 26, Section 24 nor Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 27, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 162, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 27, Section 26.While, Section 27, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, the Evidence Act, the Full Bench of Allahabad High Court, Section 27, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 24, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 8, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 26, Section 27, Section 27, the Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 27, Section 24 and Section 25, Section 26, Section 24, Section 27, Section 26 and Section 25, Section 24, Section 27, Section 26, Section 26, Section 28, Section 24, Section 27, Section 25, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 24, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 27, Section 26, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 24, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 27 of the Evidence Act, Section 25, Section 26, Section 27, Section 26, Section 25, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 26, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, Section 26, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 27, Section 25 and Section 26, Section 24, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 24, Section 27, Section 27, Section 27, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 24, Section 27, Section 24, Section 24, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 27, Section 24, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 302, Section 114, Section 380, Section 392, Section 380, Section 380, Section 428

PERSON: T.U. Mehta, Actg, C.J.1, Vijay Kumar, Darshan Lal, Shrimati Ram Ashri, Shrimati Bhagwanti Devi, Vijay Kumar, Darshan Lal, P. W. 2 Amrit Ram, Darshan Lal, Vijay Kumar, Vijay Kumar, Darshan Lal, Darshan Lal, Darshan Lal, P. W. 15 Brahma Nand, Panchas, P.W. 16, P. W. 15 Brahma Nand, Vijay Kumar, Babu Lal, Deoman Upadhyaya, Hidayatullah J., Hidayatullah J., Hidayatullah J., Ranchhoddas Atmaram v. Union, Hidayatullah J., Knox, C. J., Dhoom Singh v. State, AIR1957All197, Amiruddin Ahmed v. Emperor, Jaw, P.C., Namasudra, Chandra v. Emperor, Amir Ali, Woodroffe, Amir Ali, Woodroffe, Neharoo Mangtu Satnami, Neharoo Mangtu Satnami, Ram Richhapal v. State, Babu Lal's, Adhik Lal Pathak v., question.71, Queen-Empress, Madras, Ramanuja Ayyangar, Alibux, Raju, Madras, Vijay Kumar's, Ram Nath, Darshan Lal, Ram Nath, Khan, Bhikha Gober, Darshan Lal, Shrimati Ram Ashri, Shri V. P. Gupta, P. W. 4, Ram Ashri's, Ram Nath, P. W. 3 Ram Nath, Darshan Lal, Khan

ORG: the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Una, I.P.C., Sin', Amrit Ram, Court, Court, Advocate-General, the Patna High Court, Mathura Prasad, Emperor, Sections 24, Sections 25, Court, Court, offence.40, Magistrate, Sections of the Evidence Act, Sections 25, the Police Department, Department, Sections 24, Sections 25, Magistrate, Sections 25, Sections 25, Sections 25, Sections 148, Magistrate, Sections, Sections 148, Sections 148, Vide Queen Empress, ILR, Sections 148, Sections 25, the Allahabad High Court, Sections 24 to 27, Sections 25, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Ramkishan Mithanlal, the Supreme Court, Court, Magistrate, Sections 25, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State of Uttar Pradesh, Bench, the Supreme Court, K. Chinnaswamy, Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court, the accused unrlpi Section 27, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, Sections 25, the Supreme Court, Sections, Sections 24, ILR, The Government Advocate, the Full Court, Sections 24 to 30, the High Court, the Allahabad High Court, Gaya Prasad, the Allahabad High Court, Sections 24, Calcutta High Court, ILR, Cri LJ 305, Magistrate, Sections 25, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, AIR 1932 Cal 297, Sections 24, Calcutta, Naresh, AIR 1942 Cal 593, Calcutta High Court, the Lahore High Court, this High Court, Bulaqi v. Emperor, AIR 1928, Nagpur High Court, Sections 24, Court, Devi Ram Patt Ram v. State, ILR, The High Court of Patna, High Courts, Sections 25, Mathura Prasad v., Emperor, Commer Sahib, ILR, the High Court, High Court, AIR 1947 Sind, the Sind Court, Sections 25, AIR 1956 Hyd, Sections 25, the Bombay High Court, J., Bombay AIR 1960, the High Court, Taduturu Poligadu, Cri LJ 323, Vijay Kumar, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, I.P.C.82, the Executive Magistrate, the Executive Magistrate, the Executive Magistrate, Illustration A, the Supreme Court, I.P.C.87

CARDINAL: 4, 302, 392, 1,000/-, 500/-, 500/-.3, 1,000/-, 1, 2.5-27, 2 to 3, 1, 1, 1, 14, 18, two, 1, 1, two, 48, 152, 48, 26, 26, four, 26, three, one, 25, 26, one, 26, 25, 26, 26.49, 25, 27, 27, 26, 27, 27, 149, 150, 149, 150, 27, three, 149, 150, two, 25, 26, 26, 6, 509, 149, 26, two, 25, 26, 25, 27, 26, three, 1955CriLJ196, 22, 26, 1960CriLJ1504, 2, 65, 24, 26, four, 1963]3SCR412, 25, 26, 1961CriLJ31, three, 26.62, one, 31, 592, 10, three, three, 26, four, two, three, One, 19, 566, three, three, three, 26, 25, two, 25, 27, 27, three, one, 33, 44, 25, 26, 476, 29, 279, 280, two, 200, 37, 220, 38, two, 26, 25, 6, 156, 43, 26, two, 48, 152, 48, 497, two, 25, 12, 528, 36, 36, 48, 99, 26, 488, two, 41, 136, 41, 237, 43, two, 25, 26, 3, 3, one, 1943, 458, 45, 392, 1,000/-

DATE: 1977, ten years, ten years, 13th Jan., 1976, consideration.29-32, 25, 25, 26, 26, 26, 26, P.C. 1861, 1861, 1861, P.C. 1869, 26, a few years, 1884, 26, 26, 26, 25, 1909, 25, 25, 1918, 26, 26, 1872.For, 1019, 1936, 1047, 1937, 25, 26, 1884, 26, 1889, 1938, 1442, 26, 1956, 1960, 1940, 1942, 1956, seven years, four years, six months

GPE: Panch, Hindi, Rehai, Panch, contingencies.46, Cr, P.C., P.C., P.C., Bombay, P.C., Emperor, Counsel, evidence.63, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Rankin, Mahmood, Anna v. State of Hyderabad, Emperor, PW, PW, Sanwat, Rajasthan, Bombay, Sanwat, Cr

NORP: Panchayat, Panchayat, English, Remis Christian, terms:148, Remis Christian, Allahbux v., Serologist, Serologist

WORK_OF_ART: Vijay Kumar, 1940 Mad 12, Vijay Kumar

FAC: Sections 25, Sections 25, Sections 25, Amrut Soma v. State, murder.78

PRODUCT: Sections 25, a Full Bench, the Full Bench, Act.57, Para 9, 45 Cal 557, Cri LJ 546, Cri LJ 642, a Full Bench, Cri LJ 615, A Full Bench, Cri LJ 887, Cri LJ 1429, Cri LJ 463, Vijay Kumar, Vijay Kumar, Vijay Kumar, Cri LJ 150

ORDINAL: first, first, third, third, third, third

LOC: Misri, Sultan, Mt. Jamunia Partap