Lynch Vs. Murphy - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-02-1896

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Constitution, Page 161 U. S. 248, Hart v. Sansom

PERSON: Lynch, Pippert, English, lien, Christeina Murphy, Peter Pippert, Elizabeth English, James Lynch, Andrew Schwartz, Schwartz, Bean, Jane Lynch, Alexander English, John C. Heald, Edwin Marsh, Florence Marsh, JUSTICE WHITE, Hart, Arndt, William W. Bean, §, Dohm v. Haskin, Musgrove, Story, Eq, Peckham, Haddock, McClurg, Phillips, Gale, Watkins, J., JUSTICE BREWER

ORG: Murphy, U.S. Supreme Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Syllabus, Arndt, Griggs, the Supreme Court, Lynch, Court, Notice, N.Y. 211

CARDINAL: 161, 129, two, one, four, three-fourths, 787, 652, 404, 440, 88, 5, 313, 315, 316, 592, 124, 163, 166, 168, 169, 36, 49, 29, 222, 224, 123

GPE: U.S., the District of Columbia, the City of, Washington, Sr., Pippert, Michigan, Pomeroy, N.J.Eq, Peckham, MR

DATE: 1896, December 18-19, 1895, March 2, 1896, August, 1874, July 27, 1874, the day, May 13, 1891, May 31, 1892, 1231, 38

WORK_OF_ART: Murphy No

PERCENT: 134 U. S. 316

LANGUAGE: English

MONEY: 1,000, 10,390.42, eight thousand dollars, four thousand dollars, 500

NORP: Bean, §, Mortgages §§ 162

PRODUCT: Thereupon Mrs., Affirmed

ORDINAL: first, third