Skip to content

Gaines Vs. Rugg - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-20-1893

Court: US Supreme Court

GPE: U.S., the United States, Arkansas, Rugg, Hot Springs, Garland County, Barnes, the City of Hot Springs, United States, West v. Brashear, Noonan v. Bradley, the District of Columbia, Virginia

DATE: 1893, March 7-8, 1893, March 20, 1893, November 11, 1887, April 18, 1892, May 2, 1892, May 24, 1892, May 23, 1884, 77, December 6, 1884, November 10, 1886, the 1st of June, 1892, the same day, 14, the day, the end of each year, January 1, 1882, the 21st of December, 1892, the 6th of January, 1893, June 1, 1892, January 7, 1893, January 23, 1893, the 30th of January, 1893, March 6, 1893, nearly five years, May, January 6, 1893, 31, October, 1891, April 26, 1892, May 16, 1892, the last two

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, the Circuit Court, Court, the "Hot Springs Litigation, Rugg v. Gaines, Latta v. Gaines, the Supreme Court, the Hot Springs Commission, Barnes, the Rugg Suit, Page 148 U. S. 236, Page 148 U. S. 241, Washington Bridge Co., Kingsbury, Bank of United States v. Moss, Corning v. Troy Iron &amp, Nail Factory, Durant v. Essex Co., Washington & Georgetown Railroad v., Washington & Georgetown Railroad, Ex Parte Bradley, Ex Parte Dubuque &amp, Boyce, Waldron, Ludovicus Belding, this Honorable Court, Smith v. Gaines, Cohn v. Gaines, Garnett v. Gaines, Granger v. Gaines, the 'Hot Springs Reservation Litigation, the Hot Springs Commissioners, McDonald, Honorable Court

CARDINAL: 148, 12, 13, 228, one-half, fourteen, 14, 77, one, seven, two, fifteen, 1, 3, 611, 6, 267, 413, 16, 547, 4, 519, 304, 69, 339, 488, 51, 15, 451, 121, 17, 253, 116, 7, 364, 328, 275, 2, four, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 379, 227, 302, 303, 305, 306, 307, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 141, 308

PERSON: Goode, JUSTICE BLATCHFORD, Rector v. Gibbon, Lawrence v. Rector, William H. Gaines, Maria, D.C. Rugg, George W. Barnes, Rugg, Maria Gaines, Albert B. Gaines, Mary Waldron, Caldwell, Gibbon, Chaires, Stewart, Southard v. Russell, Purcell, Martin v. Hunter's, Lessee, Sibald, Tyler v. Maguire, Salmon, Mackall, Hickman, Fort Scott, McDade, Perkins, Executors v. Grundy, McDonald v. Belding, Henry, Albert Belding, Albert, Henry Belding, Dugan v. Gaines, Allen v. Gaines, Madison, Neubert, Sumpter, Latta

LOC: the Eastern District, Gaines, Pacific Railroad

MONEY: 1,016.38, 811.68, 245, 2,073.06, 298, 158.40, 500, 956.40, 1,116.66, 100, 3,616.66, 250, 120, 6,195

NORP: Barnes

PERCENT: six percent, 134 U. S. 650, 47 U. S. 40, 97 U. S. 361, 101 U. S. 555, 116 U. S., 141 U. S. 415, 55 U. S. 330, 145 U. S. 492

PRODUCT: Thereupon, Executors

ORDINAL: second, first, fifth

WORK_OF_ART: 9 Pet, Case No.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //