Toplitz Vs. Hedden - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-28-1892

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the Tariff Act

PERSON: Toplitz v. Hedden - 146, Toplitz v. Hedden, Woolens, JUSTICE BLATCHFORD, Toplitz, Herman Schwarz, Edward L. Hedden, Lacombe, S. S. Cox, McMasters, Burton, Evanston, Gunn, Cox, Schwarz, Barber, Arthur v. Lahey, Worthington, Abbott, Arthur, Butterfield, Robertson

DATE: 1892, November 16, 1892, November 28, 1892, 21, 2502, March 3, 1883, July, 1885, December, 1885, July, 1886, January, 1888, November, 1888, 2505, c. 121, the summer of 1882, 1883, October, 1882, the 3d of March, 1883, March, 1883

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Court, L. Toplitz & Co., the Superior Court of the City of New York, the Circuit Court, Congress, Driggs, Page 146 U. S. 256, Salomon

CARDINAL: 146, 22, 509, 511, 24, thirty-five, thirty, 33, 1, One, 2, 3, 515, 4, 680, 20, 125, one, 96

GPE: U.S., NEW YORK, New York, Glasgow, Scotland, the United States, valorem, the City of New York, Camden, United States

NORP: Scotch

WORK_OF_ART: Schedule K, Schedule N, Sundries, Schedule K -- Wool, Flannels, Schedule N -- Sundries, Importers of Scotch Caps

TIME: 6 of the Act of March 3, 1883

MONEY: 6,896.06, thirty cents, ten cents, above thirty cents, forty cents, twelve cents, above forty cents, sixty cents, eighteen cents, above sixty cents, eighty cents, twenty-four cents, above eighty cents, thirty-five cents

LOC: the Southern District

ORDINAL: first, second

PERCENT: 99 U. S. 660, 125 U. S. 70