Little Vs. Bowers - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Apr-07-1890

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Section 10, Article I

GPE: U.S., NEW JERSEY, New Jersey, the City of Elizabeth, the United States, Wabaunsee County v., Lamborn v. County Commissioners, Nebraska, Boston, New York, Cleveland, San Mateo County

DATE: 1890, January 30, 1890 Motion, March 3, 1890, April 7, 1890, the 6th of November, 1882, the year 1876, the years 1877 to 1882, March 17, 1854, the years 1876, 1882, the year 1887, 1886, the years 1876 to 1882, the year 1883, several months, the years 1884, 1885, the years 1884 to 1887, 1884, sixty days, six months, 14, at least several months, at least two years ago

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Court, Robertson v. Bradbury, the Supreme Court, the State of New Jersey, the Central Railroad Company of, Comptroller of the City of Elizabeth, the Court of Errors and Appeals, the supreme court, the New Jersey Legislature, Railroad Co. v. Commissioners, the Union Pacific Railroad Company, Congress, Wood Paper Co., Southern Pacific Railroad Co., Smith v. Junction Railway, Freeholders of Union

CARDINAL: 134, 194, 8, 98, 12, 2, 251, 1, 333, 3, 29, 546, 44

PERCENT: 132 U. S. 491, 97 U. S. 181, 98 U. S. 541

PERSON: Henry S. Little, Samuel D. Bowers, H. W. Douty, certiorari, Waite, Shaw, Preston, Robertson, Veazie, Henkin, Guerss, Elsam, N.J.Law 438

ORDINAL: First, Second, sixteenth

EVENT: Black 419

PRODUCT: Freeholders

NORP: Essex