Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Fond Du Lac County Vs. May

Decided On : Dec-15-1890

Court : US Supreme Court

GPE: Fond du Lac County, Fond du, Lac County, U.S., Fond du, Lac County, U.S., the United States, Wisconsin, the County of Fond du Lac, Indianapolis, the County of Marion, Indiana, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Fond du Lac, the Chemung County Jail, New York, the Chemung County Jail, Brooklyn, St. Germain, Brooklyn

DATE: 1890, May, 1890, November 26, 1890, December 15, 1890, October 4, 1859, 4, the 26th of September, 1885, October 4, 1859, fourteen years, that day, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, October, 1873, seven years, that day, the 27th of February, 1880, the 6th of March, 1880, the 7th of June, 1880, the 6th of March, 1882, 3, October 4, 1873, October 4, 1880, May, 3, 1869, books many years ago, 1859, May, 1869, many years before 1859, 1859, 4, 4, 91 U. S. 37, 132 U. S. 84, 109 U. S. 117, 114 U. S. 149, 132 U. S. 84, July 4, 1836, c. 357, 4, 116 U. S. 237

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Court, the Circuit Court, the State of Wisconsin, State, Page 137 U. S. 397 , the State of Wisconsin, Page 137 U. S. 399 , Page 137 U. S. 400 , Elmira, the Wisconsin State Prison, Moulton, Myers, Manhattan Railway Co., Watson v. Cincinnati &c., Railway Co., Rivers Mfg. Co., Crosstown Railroad Co., Miners' Iron Works, Manhattan Railway Co.

CARDINAL: 137, 61, 137, 25,662, 1, 3, 25,662, 1, 2, one, one, 1, 4, 1, 3, 4, 27, 691, 1, 2, One, 1, 4, two, one, two, two, four, 1, 3, 4, 1, 3, 1, 3, 4, two-fold, three, four, three, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 3, 1, 1, 1, 3, 3, 4, 3, 13, 453, 23, 181, Two, 5, 119, 94, 3, one, 7, 295, four

PERSON: Edwin May, Verdict, JUSTICE BLATCHFORD, Sarah May, Edwin May, Edwin May, Fig, Figs, Edwin Forrest May, Edwin May, McGinnis, Edwin May, McGinnis, Luther V. Moulton, Moulton, May, Moulton, Moulton, Moulton, Tucker, Brown v. Piper, Dunbar, Vinton v. Hamilton, Heald, Rice, Hall, Thompson, Stephenson, Aron, Hill, Burt v. Evory, Stephenson, Hendy, Aron, Cochrane v. Deener, Jacobs v. Baker, Brown, Davis, Forncrook v. Root

LOC: the Eastern District

PRODUCT: F

ORDINAL: first, first, First, Second, Third, 4th, first, third, fourth, fourth, second, third, fourth, sixth

MONEY: 1,774.68, 1,774.68, 135 U. S. 227

QUANTITY: a few feet

FAC: the Wisconsin State Prison

NORP: D.

WORK_OF_ART: The Corn Planter Patent

PERCENT: 94 U. S. 187 , 132 U. S. 161 , 133 U. S. 349

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //