Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Marrow Vs. Brinkley

Decided On : Jan-21-1889

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Constitution, the Confiscation Act, Constitution

PERSON: Marrow, Brinkley - 129, Marrow, CHIEF, William P. Marrow, Mary E., Elizabeth R. West, George B. West, M. Smith, Mary E. Marrow, Elizabeth R. West, G. B. West, Missouri Smith, Parker West, William P. Marrow, M. E., E. R. West, G. B. West, M. Smith, C. K. Mallory, Thomas Tabb, G. M. Peek, W. P. Marrow, Mary E., George B. West

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., the United States, the County of, Elizabeth City, Virginia, Missouri, Missouri, the United States, Virginia, the United States, the State of Virginia

DATE: 1889, 1889, 1262, January 7, 1889, January 21, 1889, 1870, five years, September, 1870, annual, annual, five years, May 4, 1871, June 30, 1864, July 17, 1862, February 15, 1865, as early as 1861, December, 1871, the 4th of May, 1872, this day, October, 1872, January, 1886, May 4, 1871, May 4, 1872, May 4, 1872, the 17th day of May, 1888, the 26th day of October, 1886, July 17, 1862, May, 1872

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Brinkley, THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, Syllabus, Court, the Court , the Circuit Court of, Parker West, Newport News, the Newport News, Missouri Smith, the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Court, Court, Court

PRODUCT: Marrow, Brinkley No

CARDINAL: 129, 129, one, 182

LOC: Parker West, West, West, West, West, Parker West, West, West

QUANTITY: 300 acres

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //