Amy Vs. Watertown - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Apr-08-1889

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Page 130 U. S. 322, Page 130 U. S. 324, Page 130 U. S. 325

PERSON: Amy, Amy v. Watertown, Justice Strong, Booth, P.C. ed, Hoveden, Lord Annesley, Blennerhassett, Mitf, ed, Mansfield, Bree v. Holbech, Wilkinson, Brown, Howard, Hunter v. Gibbons, Blair, Cottenham, Limitations c. 18, Hanger, Abbott, James, Hall

CARDINAL: 130, 2, 197, three, ten, 2d, 3d, 10, 218, one, 4, 163, 3, 143, 607, 631, 104, 129, 269, 114, 274, 586, 188, 654, 656, 73, 39, 464, 5, 542, 104-112, 11, 6, 532, 9, 687, 1, 16, 19

GPE: U.S., the City of Watertown, the City of, the State of Wisconsin, Watertown, the United States, Wisconsin

DATE: 1889, March 13, 1889, April 8, 1889, the 19th of June, 1883, the 1st day of June, 1856, the 1st day of January, 1877, semiannually, six years, the 1st day of March, A.D. 1873, each year, the 1st day of March, 1873, the first day of March, 1873, twenty days, as 1st, an early day, c. 18, 42, 45

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Court, Warrington, South Sea Co., Wymondsell, Wood on Limitations § 58, Angell, Limitations, Imperial Gas Co., London Gas Co., Wigram, Wood on Limitations c. 22, Wood on Limitations, The Protector, Wood on Limitations 9, Fraud, Wilkinson on Limitations 40

ORDINAL: 26th, 4th, 5th

MONEY: 1,000

PERCENT: eight percent

TIME: a few hours

NORP: English