Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Mcmurray Vs. Mallory
Decided On : Mar-24-1884
Court : US Supreme Court
PERSON: McMurray, McMurray v. Mallory, McMurray v. Mallory Argued, Abel Barker, Jabez A. Bostwick, Louis McMurray, Edward M. Lang, George Burnham, Jesse C. Luddington, Abel Barker, Edward M. Lang, Jabez A. Bostwick, Barker, Bostwick, Gill v. Wells, Ball, James v. Campbell, Heald, Rice, Johnson, Bantz, Wing v. Anthony, Bostwick, Bostwick, Bostwick, Bostwick, Bostwick, Bostwick
GPE: U.S., U.S.
DATE: 1884, 1884, March 11-12, 1884, March 24, 1884, May 17, 1870, October 29th, 1878, June 21, 1810, September 2, 1879, May 17, 1870, January 11, 1876, July 1, 1879, June 21, 1870, October 29, 1878, May 21, 1872, 105 U. S. 539, 105 U. S. 160, 106 U. S. 142, September 3, 1878, September 24, 1883, more than two years and a half
ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. 97, Syllabus, E. M. Lang & Co., Court, Court, McMurray, Lang & Burnham, Dwight D. Mallory, D. D. Mallory & Co., E. M. Lang & Co., Page 111 U. S. 99 , Tillery & Ewalt, F, the Tillery & Ewalt, The Wood Paper Patent, Powder Works, Miller v. Brass Company, Railroad Company, the Tillery & Ewalt, the Tillery & Ewalt, the Tillery & Ewalt, the Tillery & Ewalt, Barker, the Tillery & Ewalt, the Tillery & Ewalt, Barker, E. M. Lang & Co., the Patent Office, the Tillery & Ewalt, the Tillery & Ewalt, the Patent Page 111 U. S. 109 Office, Court
CARDINAL: 111, 111, one, one, three, two, one, 1, 2, 3, five, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, one-half, three, 16, three, two, two, three, three, 22, 1, 23, 568, 128, one, One, two, three, two, one, two, one, 1, 2, One, six
ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, first, first, second, first, first, second, first, third, first, first, fourth, fifth, fourth, fourth, fifth, first, second, fourth, fifth, first, second, first, first, second
NORP: Barker, Barker, Prouty v., Barker, Barker, D., Barker, Barker, Barker, Barker, Barker, Barker, Barker, Barker
PRODUCT: F
PERCENT: 98 U. S. 126