Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Drury Vs. Hayden

Decided On : Apr-07-1884

Court : US Supreme Court

ORG: Drury, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. 223, Hayden Submitted, Page 111 U. S. 224 , Drury, Drury, Drury, Drury, Court, New Orleans Canal Company, Drury, Drury, Drury, Drury, Drury, Daggett to, Drury

GPE: U.S., U.S., Chicago, Daggett, Lockwood

DATE: 1884, 1884, March 25, 1884, April 7, 1884, July 28, 1875, five years, two and three years, December 14, 1875, January 28, 1876, April 12, 1876, a few days, July 12, 1877, July 18, 1877, April 12, 1876, January 26, 1878, February 6, 1880, February 13, 1880

CARDINAL: 111, 111, 223, two, two, two, two, two, About November 1, 1876, two, 9

PERSON: Drury, Solomon Snow, Joseph E. Loockwood, Edwin C. Larned, Roswell B. Bacon, William C. Snow, William C. Snow, Isaac M. Daggett, Daggett, Daggett, William Drury, Daggett, Daggett, Annie E. Hayden, Hayden, Hayden v. Snow, Swift, Daggett, Daggett, Daggett, Elliott v. Sackett

ORDINAL: first, second, second, second, second, first, second

MONEY: 28,000, 6,000, 15,194.21

FAC: Bissell 511

PERCENT: 95 U. S. 16

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //