Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Arunkumar Vs. State, Sub Inspector of Police and Sangeetha

Decided On : Apr-19-2007

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 498-A, Section 4, Section 161 Cr, Section 498-A I.P.C., the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 161, Section 161 Cr, Section 498-A I.P.C., Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 498-A, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 161 Cr, Section 498-A I.P.C.

PERSON: Basha, A. Ragunathan, A-4, A-4, A-4, Thangarasu, A-4, A-4, A-1, A-1, A-4, Ramesh v. State of T.N., A-4, A-4, A-4

CARDINAL: four, 506(ii, 161, 735, 498, 100, 10, 100, 10, 10,00,000/-, 735, 498, 100, 10

GPE: P.C., Cr, P.C., Ramesh v. State of, Counsel, P.C., Delhi, Mumbai, P.C.

ORG: the Supreme Court, T.N., Government Advocate, Government Advocate, Government Advocate, Government Advocate, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, FIR, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Sections, Court

DATE: 2005, 2005, between March and October 1997, some days

MONEY: 406 I.P.C. and Section 4, 406 I.P.C. and Section 4, 406 I.P.C. and Section 4

ORDINAL: second, second, second, 6th, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //