Sam Daniel Vs. John - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Feb-23-2004

Court: Chennai

LAW: Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 34, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

PERSON: R. Banumathi J.1, S. T. C. No, Marthandam, Kuzhithurai Branch, Kuzhithurai Branch, Kuzhithurai Branch, Marthandam, Sasikumar, O. S. No, Sasikumar, O. S. No, P. W. 1, P. W. 2, D. W. 1, Hiten P. Dalal, Bratindranath Banerjee, Usharani, O. S. No, Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation, O. P. No, Usharani, Hiten P. Dalai v. Bratindranath Banerjee, Madras, A. Vaidyanatha Iyer

DATE: 1992, June 17, 1996, 1992, April 14, 1992, June 8, 1992, July 17, 1992, July 24, 1992, August 7, 1992, August 19, 1992, 6579, 1993, 1995, 2001, TN-74 6579, February 29, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1994, 1677, 1993, 2001, '17

ORG: Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabapuram, Agricultural Department, Nesamani Memorial Christian College, Canara Bank, Bankers-State Bank of India, the State Bank of India, the Negotiable Instruments Act.3, Nesamani Memorial Christian College, State Bank of India (Venkatraman, prosecution.10, Sections 419, State, the High Court

CARDINAL: 75,000, two, 40,000, one, 242, 384, 1.50, 1, 2, 1, 319.7, 9, two, 40,000, one, 40,000, 40,000, 40,000, three, 292, 384, 305, 406, 417, 420, 75,000, 1, 319, 139, 582, 106, 139, 1958CriLJ232

GPE: Marthandam, Sasikumar, Rajendran, Sasikumar, name.12, Sasikumar, Rajendran

FAC: Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation

NORP: D., D., Indian

ORDINAL: first

PRODUCT: Sections 138