Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Radha Gajapathi Raju Vs. Assistant Controller of Estate Duty

Decided On : Jun-12-1998

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Estate Duty Act, the Estate Duty Act, Section 55, the Estate Duty Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, the Estate Duty Act, the Estate Duty Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, the Estate Duty Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Estate Duty Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 5, the Estate Duty Act, the Estate Duty Act, Section 5, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 108, Section 107, Section 107, Section 108, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 34, LW 30, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, the Hindu Succession Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 32(3, Section 55, the Estate Duty Act, the Estate Duty Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, the Indian Succession Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act, Section 108, the Evidence Act

PERSON: N.V. Balasubramanian, G. I. R. No, Tiruvanmiyur Beach, V. Ramachandran, S.V. Subramaniam, Parikhit Muduli, Champa Dei, N. Jayalakshmi Ammal, R. Gopala Pathar, Lal Chand Marwari, Mahant Ramrup Gir AIR, Rango Balaji v., Phene, Bal Naicken, Achama Naicken, Jaladi Burreyya, Seshi Ammal, Pillai, Velayuthan Pillai, Husseiny J. Bhagat v. LIC, Pathar, N. Jayalakshmi Ammal, Jayalakshmi Ammal, R. Gopala Pathar, Bal Naicken v., Achama Naicken, Madhavan Nair J., S. A. Nos, Devaganugula Kanakamma v. Devaganugula Narasamma, Sabapathy v. Pattammal, Abdul Jabbar Sahib, Abdul Hafiz Sahib, Balambal v. Kannammal, Ram Dayal, Prem Ananthi v. Tahsildar, Rathnam v., Kantheti Varadarajulu, AIR1970AP246, C. Abdul Jabbar Sahib, Abdul Hafiz Sahib, N. Jayalakshmi v. Gopala Pathar, Pathar, N. Jayalakshmi Ammal, AIR1926Cal1056, Shivarudrappa AIR, Venkata Subba Rao v. G. Subba Rao, Kantheti Varadarajulu, AIR1970AP246, Muduli, Champa Dei, Rami, AIR1993Bom64, Ram Singh v. Board of Revenue, AIR1964All310, pending.33, W. M. P. No

NORP: J.1, R.

CARDINAL: 964, 378, seven, 9, three, four, 11, 1899, 296, 139, 39, 316, three, four, 55, 47, 55 to 58, 47, one, 1, 489, 493, 107, 108, 107, 108, 1993)2SCC199, 1986]1SCR939, 99, 114, 66, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1967]1SCR153, two, one, 378, 378

DATE: February 3, 1988, 1953, 1953, August 2, 1975, March 25, 1982, 1975, 30 days, the past seven years, March 3, 1983, September 14, 1983, October 19, 1983, August 2, 1975, more than seven years, June 7, 1985, February 7, 1986, January 22, 1987, October 13, 1986, January 22, 1987, January 30, 1987, August 2, 1975, August 4, 1987, August 26, 1987, October 27, 1987, January 5, 1988, January 30, 1987, March 16, 1985, January 30, 1987, 1987, January 30, 1987, January 30, 1987, March 16, 1985, the expiry of seven years, 1926, seven years, the end of seven years, seven years, 1870, seven years, the seven years, seven years, the period of seven years, seven years, seven years, seven years, less than seven years', more than seven years, the seven years or, the lapse of seven years, the lapse of seven years, the lapse of seven years, ten years, 1922, August 13, 1924, the end of seven years, more than seven years, seven years, the end of seven years, the period of seven years, 1922, 1924, 1993)2MLJ283, seven years, 1997, 1993)2MLJ283, thirty years, more than seven years, April 14, 1937, 1963, seven years, 1963, the year 1955, seven years, the end of seven years, the seven years, seven years, seven years, 1872, August 2, 1975, March 25, 1982, the period of seven years, September 14, 1983, the period of seven years, April 2, 1982, October 19, 1983, more than seven years, September 14, 1983, October 19, 1983, the expiry of, seven years, the expiry of, seven years, the expiry of, seven years, the expiry of, seven years, 1920 Bom 85, 1987, January 13, 1987, 1987, 1988, the expiry of, seven years, thirty days, March 16, 1985, March 16, 1985

ORG: P.V. Gajapathi Raju.2, Radha Gajapathi Raju, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, Gajapathi Raju, Chennai, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, Gajapathi Raju, the High Court, Gajapathi Raju, Gajapathi Raju, the High Court, the Inspector of Police, Gajapathi Raju, High Court, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, Gajapathi Raju, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, Gajapathi Raju, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, Sections 7 to 17, The Supreme Court, The Privy Council, the Privy Council, Lordships, Mudiyeppa ILR, Lordships, AIR1921Mad285, Ponduri Adeyya, Bench, AIR1963Mad385, AIR1921Mad285, Coimbatore, Registrar, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, American Express Bank Ltd., Calcutta Steel Co., Lordships, Sodhi Transport Co., State of U. P., SN, SC, Sections 111, The Calcutta High Court, the Goods of Ganesh Das, The Travancore-Cochin High Court, The Mysore High Court, The Mysore High Court, The Andhra Pradesh High Court, Bapayya AIR 1957, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, The Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, The Orissa High Court, The Bombay High Court, Wadehar v. Union of India, the applicability of Section 108, The Supreme Court, P.V. Gajapathi Raju, Gajapathi Raju, P.V. Gajapathy Raju, P.V. Gajapathy Raju, P.V. Gajapathy Raju, the Bombay High Court, the Allahabad High Court, P.V. Gajapathy Raju, P.V. Gajapathy Raju, P.V. Gajapathy Raju

LOC: Madras, the Evidence Act.30

GPE: India, India, England, Gnanamuthu, Narayana, India, Gopala, Narbada, Tadepalli Ram, Gopala, Ramabai, Shankareppa, Venkateswarlu, Tadepalli Ram Rathnam v., Parikhit, Mathru, Ramrati Kuer, Jeshankar Reva-shankar

PRODUCT: LR 5 Ch, 380

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //