Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gray Vs. Rollo

Decided On : Jan-01-1873

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Bankrupt Act, the Bankrupt Act, the Bankrupt Act, the Bankrupt Act

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Illinois, England, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Gaylord

DATE: 1873, 18, 1873, 4. A., 1800, 1867

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, the Merchants' Insurance Company of Chicago, Gaylord, Gray Brothers, Gray Brothers, Gaylord, Court, the Supreme Court of, Court, Gaylord, Gray Brothers, Bankrupt, Equity Jurisprudence, Court, Gray Brothers, Gray and, Gray Brothers, Court, Gaylord

CARDINAL: 85, 629 629, 85, 18, 629, 1, 2, two, one, two, 3, one, two, one, two, half, two, 1, 2, two, one, three, two, one-half, 3, 5, 6, one, 8, two, one, two, two, one, 1, 526, 20, 2, 3, 34, 4, 7, 5, 379, 2, 261, 6, 34, 8, 33, 42

PERSON: Gray v. Rollo, Setoff, William Rollo, Moses Gray, Franklin Gray, herein Gray, J. S. Norton, Tucker, Oxley, Wrenshall, Cook, Franklin Gray, Story, Tucker, Oxley, Tucker, Oxley, Moore, Tucker, Tucker, Oxley, Tucker, Tucker, Tucker, Tucker, Oxley, Tucker, Oxley, Tucker, Oxley, Tustin v. Cameron, Wharton, Craig v. Henderson

ORDINAL: third

NORP: B.

MONEY: 5,555, 30,000

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //