E.i.D. Parry (India) Limited Vs. the Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Decided On : Oct-31-1989

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Interest Act, the Interest Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Interest Act, Section 11, the Industrial Disputes Act, Article 215, Section 48, Section 48, Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 80, Negotiable Instruments Act, the Indian Succession Act, Section 111-CC of the Motor Vehicles Act and Section 29, the Arbitration Act, the Interest Act, Section 18(1, the Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 25(1, Article 133 of the Constitution of India, Article 133

ORG: Srinivasan, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Industrial Tribunal, Court, The Reid Co-, Timber Works Ltd., Madras v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, AIR1970Mad439, Court, the Employees' Insurance Court, a Civil Court, the Employees' Insurance Court, the Industrial Tribunal, The Bharat Bank, Ltd., the Bharat Bank, the Supreme Court, Industrial Tribunal, a Civil Court, Court, Industrial Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the Contempt of Courts Act, the Supreme Court, Judgment, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Registrar, Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, doubt;A, Registrar, Court, Courts, Registrar, Court, Court, Sovereign, Sovereign, Court, Court of Justice, Cooper v. Wilson, the Gujarat High Court, Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal, the Contempt of Courts Act, Industrial Tribunal, Court, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, The Supreme Court, Court, Learned Counsel, the Sale of Goods Acts, Section 23, Learned Counsel, the Payment of Bonus Act, the Industrial Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Learned Counsel, Management, High Court, Management, Clause 1.0, Gratuity, Bonus, the High Court, Gratuity, Bonus Payable, Court, Court, the Supreme Court of India, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 20389, 1950)NULLLLJ921SC, 1, two, 1967CriLJ1380a, 9, 1, 2, 2, two, four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1839.8, 1988]1SCR253, 351, 353, 263.1987, 1

DATE: 1989, 1978, August, 1981, 1978, three years later, 1981, 1978, 1839, 1839, 1839, Mad., 1956CriLJ156, 6 of 1935, 1952, 1937, 1956CriLJ156, 1986, 1839, 1976, 1987, about 11 years, 4514, 1982, 2344, 1987, 26.3.1987, 26.3.1987, 1958, 4514, 1982, 2344, 1987, 2979, 2980, 2981, 1.9.1976 to 28.2.1987, 1.3.1987 to 31.12.1989

PERSON: Principal, Ltd. Delhi, Brajnandan Sinha v., Jyothi Narain, Anr, Registrar, Orissa Co-operative, Brajnandan Sinha's, Shaikh Mohammed Bhikhan Hussainbhai, Chandrabhanu Cinema and Ors, Galimala, Management.11, Madras

GPE: Maharajan, Delhi, Hayles, I.L.R., India, shell;It, Bihar, Halsbury, India

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, a Full Bench

LANGUAGE: Thakur

ORDINAL: third

EVENT: Interest Act 1839

TIME: the later Act

PERCENT: 4%, 7.1%, 4%, 3.1%, another 4%, another 4%, 9%, 9%, 12%, 9%

FAC: the Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules

LOC: the Writ Petitions