Semantic Analysis by spaCy
In Re: Pandian and anr.
Decided On : Feb-20-1970
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 10, Section 16, the Madras Prohibition Act, Section 10, Section 510, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 510, the Prohibition Act
PERSON: K.N. Mudaliyar, J.1, Mambalam High Road, P. W. 2, Usrabala Kashayam, H. O. Five Falls Road, Amirthathi Kashayam, Five Falls Road, Madras, Madras, Exhibit P-3, Exhibit P-4, Amirthathi Kashayam', Usarabala Kashayam ', Exhibit P-4, Exhibit D-1, M.O., Government Order, Drakshasava, Coelho, Anr, J., Appendix 3-A., Abdullah v. State
CARDINAL: two, 1, 1, 2, 26, 7, one, 2, 950, 1, 200, 1, 2, 1, 2, Five, five, 436, ten, five, 0, 8, five, 1, 1, 1, 2, 407, 1, 3, 2, 407, one, 109, 109
DATE: 3031, 1st November, 1958, 1150, 10th February, 1968, 1968, 13th February, 1968, 14th June, 1968, 3031, November, 1958, 25th January, 1968, 1968, 1969, 2857, 1968, 1951, 1951
GPE: Home, T. Nagar, Veerappan, M.Os, M.Os, Cr, M.Os, Counsel, Crl, Panchapakesa Ayyar
NORP: Ayurvedic, Exhibit P-1, Ayurvedic
ORG: Accused 1, Courtallam, Jothi Pharmacy, Courtallam, P.W. 2, M.O. 1, M.O. 2, the Chemical Examiner, the Chemical Examiner, the Chemical Examiner, M.O. 1, M.O. 2, P.W. 1.3, M.O. 1, M.O. 2, Accused 1, M.O. 1, M.O. 2, the Jothi Pharmacy, Courtallam, M.O. 2, the Indian System of Medicine, M.O. 1, M.O. 2, the Madras Chloral Hyderate (Chloral, Exhibit P-4, Srinivasan, L.W. 208, The Appellate Court, Court, Magistrate, Public Prosecutor, Chemical Examiner, Finger Print Bureau, Mint, Court, the Chemical Examiner, M.O. 1, M.O. 2, Exhibit P-4 and Section 510, M.O. 1, M.O. 2, M.O. 1, M.O. 2, Courtallam, Public Prosecutor, Courtallam, M.O. 1, M.O. 2, Public Prosecutor's
TIME: 30 p.m. and 8 p.m.
PRODUCT: P.W. 1, P.W. 1's, P.W. 1
WORK_OF_ART: M.O. 1, M.O. 2, M.O. 2, M.O. 1, Sohoni's Code of Criminal Procedure, 15th
ORDINAL: first, 1st, first
MONEY: 1.0 per cent, 1.25 per cent
LOC: Exhibit P-4
EVENT: Prohibition