Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

In Re: S.P. Naidu

Decided On : Jan-05-1970

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 3, Section 3 of the Act, Section 4, Section 12, the Waterworks Clauses Act

PERSON: Mudaliyar, R. Vaidyanatha Iyer, Magistarate, Ramakrishnan, R. Vaidyanatha Iyer, Q.B. 192, Avery L.R., A.C. 181, Dunedin

NORP: J.1, P.Ws, D.

CARDINAL: 3(2, 1949.2, 567, one, 1, 2, 2, 1, one, 12, 567, 4, 2, 1 and 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1863.7, 7, 1 and 2, 1, 2

ORG: the Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, Sub-Magistrate, Ramakrishnan, Ramakrishnan, Ramakrishnan, Ramakrishnan, Ramakrishnan, Estate, Estate, Magistrate, Smith v. Muller, the Harrogate Corporation v. Mackay, Reliance, the House of Lords in Metropolitan Water Board, the Metropolitan Water Board, Magistrate, Estate, Estate

GPE: Nelliyalam Village, Ramakrishnan, Ramakrishnan, Buckley, L.J.

TIME: about a quarter acre

PRODUCT: Act.4, P.W. 2

QUANTITY: about 1/4 acre, 4,500 acres

ORDINAL: first, second

DATE: 1894, 1882, 1907, 1914, 1907

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //