Le Roy Vs. Tatham - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-01-1852

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the "Repertory of Arts

PERSON: Roy v. Tatham - 55, Roy v. Tatham, Roy v., Robert W. Lowber, John, Charles Hanson, G. N. Tatham, Le Roy, Smith, Lowber, Leroy, Thomas Burr, George W. Potter, George Fox, John Hague, Joseph Bramah, Potter, Keller, XV, McLEAN, Thomas Burr of Shrewsbury, John Hanson, Thomas Burr's, Bush, Jesse Fox, Webster, Justice Clerk

GPE: U.S., NEW YORK, Huddersfield, England, the United States, Fox, Hague, Bramah, Tatham, piston, the City of New York, Shropshire, Harvey

DATE: 1852, the 8th of May, 1817, the 31st of August, 1837, the 10th of January, 1840, the 29th of March, 1841, the 12th of October, 1841, the 14th of March, 1846, fourteen years, 1846, the last eighteen months, 1841, 11th April, 1820, 1831, 1833, 1830, 1822, 1817, 1836, 1797, eighteen months, April 11, 1820, March 14, 1846, March 29, 1841, the year 1797 to 1832, the 13th of April and 13th of May, 1846, the 25th day of May, 1849, the same 25th day of May, 1849, the 11th of April, 1820, August 31, 1837, the 12th, December 5, 1817, October 31, 1797

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Hansons, H. B. & B. Tatham, J. & C. Hanson, Burroughs Titus, Busk & Harvey, Ellis & Burr, Titus, Le Roy & Smith, Burr's, Burr, Fox, LeRoy & Co., Lowber & LeRoy, Bramah, the Burr Bramah, Hanson, XII, Busk, Court, the Patent Office, Franklin Journal of Arts, Househill Company, Neilson

CARDINAL: 55, 156 156, 14, 156, two, one, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 171, 344, 683

ORDINAL: third, first

MONEY: 50,000, 20,000, 11,394, 11,748.60, 55 cents, six cents, fifty thousand dollars, twenty thousand dollars

QUANTITY: 2,000 tons, two thousand tons

NORP: English

WORK_OF_ART: Proposition VII, Proposition XVI