In Re: Muthian Nadar - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Sep-23-1970

Court: Chennai

LAW: Section 164, Section 164, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 25, Section 27.11, Section 145, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 145, the Evidence Act, Section 145, the Evidence Act, Section 145, Section 145, Section 164, Section 145, the Evidence Act and Section 288, Section 479-A, Section 236

PERSON: K.N. Mudaliyar, Muthian Nadar, Leela Pushpam, Leela Pushpam, Leela Pushpam, Leela Pushpam, Leela Pushpam, Leela Pushpam, Leela, Leela Pushpan, Exs, Leela Pushpam, Surgeon, Leela Pushpam, Exs, P. Ws 1, the F. I. R., Tara Singh v. State, Sessions, Hence Ex, Leela Pushpam, Leela Pushpam, Ex, Exs P. 1, Leela Pushpam, Leela Pushpam, C. M. P. No, M. P. 236, Ramanathapuram, C. Balasubramaniam, M. P. N. 611

NORP: J.1, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, proceeded)We, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws

ORG: IPC, P.W. l's, P.W., P.W. 5, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, the Sub Magistrate, ILR, Exs, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, P.W. 1, the Committing Magistrate, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Criminal P.C., Sessions the Public Prosecutor, Magistrate, Court, the Supreme Court, follows:-We, Court, Ramakrishnan, the Sessions Court, the Supreme Court, the Sub Magistrate, Court, Criminal P.C. Ex, Court, Magistrate, Exs, the Supreme Court, the Sessions Court, Counsel, Criminal P.C., Magistrate, Court

CARDINAL: two, 1 to 3, three, 2 and 3, one, three, 1 to 3, 1, 2, three, 1 to 3, 1 to P. 3, 1 to 3, 13-3-1969, about 12-30 p.m., two, 8, 2-30, 6, two, 6, 14, 10, 299, 139, 1964]4SCR589, 1 to P. 3, 1 to 3, 1, 2, 3, four, 1 to 3, 13-3-1969, about 12-30 p.m., 1, 2, 2 and 3, 8, 8, 2, 3, 1951]2SCR729, 11, one, 1 to 3, three, 1 to 3, three, 1 to 3, 1952CriLJ1131, at least one, only one, two, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, 1, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1 to 3, 1, 3, 1 to P. 3, 1964]4SCR589, two, one, one, 1 to 3, 3.13, two, 1 to 3, 611, 777, 1969.17, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, three, 1, 3.19, 1 to 3, 1 to 3.20, 1 to 3

DATE: the 13th day of March 1969, 1942, substance.10, 1872.We, 1963, 1963, 1970, 1969, 1969, 1970

TIME: about 12 noon, 11 a.m., about 24 hours, about 12 noon

PRODUCT: P.W. 1, P.W. 8, P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 8, P.W. 8, P.W. 8, P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 8, Section 288, Cri LJ 98, P.W. 3, P.W. 6

QUANTITY: 5 a. m., 8 p. m. P.Ws

WORK_OF_ART: Ayyoh', Session Under Section 288

GPE: Srivilliputtur, CrIPC, Sharanappa v. State, Thiruthangal, Thiruthangal, Counsel, Bhagwan, Singh v. State of Punjab, Kunhamed Kutti, Kumaraswami Naicker v. State, Madras State, Periyasami v. State, Srivilliputtur, Ex, Counsel, Crl, Crl

ORDINAL: first, first, second