State Vs. Radhakrishnan

Decided On : Feb-11-2003

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 420 I.P.C., Section 15, Section 438 Cr, Section 420 I.P.C., Section 420 I.P.C., Section 420 I.P.C., Section 420 I.P.C., Section 15, Magic Remedies Act, the Companies Act, Section 420 I.P.C., the Central Act, Section 420 I.P.C., Section 420 I.P.C., Section 4, Section 420 I.P.C., the Money Circulation Scheme, the Central Act, Section 3 of the Act, the Central Act, the Central Act 43 of 1978, Section 3 of the Act, Section 4, Section 3, Section 167(2, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 386, Section 386, Section 4 of the Central Act, Section 4, the Central Act, Section 10 of the Act, Section 4, the Central Act 43 of 1978, Section 4, the Central Act, Section 438 Cr, Section 438, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code

GPE: Nagappan, Crl, Crime, P.C., Crl, Delhi, Public, S.C., Gujarat, Haryana, Cr, P.C., P.C., Gurbaksh, Singh v. State of Punjab, C.B.I., Apex, Muraleedharan, Kerala, Crl

NORP: J.1, Rs.5,000, Maharashtra

ORG: The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Chennai, Chennai, Sections 4, Indian Medical Council Act, Magic Remedies Objectionable Advertisement Act, Chennai, Principal Sessions, the Money Circulation Scheme, the Supreme Court, Multi Level Network Marketing System, Amway, Oriflame, Multi Level Marketing System, Sections 4, the Indian Medical Council Act and, Central Sales Tax, Income Tax, Government Counselon the Criminal Side, SessionsJudge, Multi Level Marketing System, the Supreme Court, the Additional Advocate General, Government Counsel, Magnetic Bed, Magnetic Bed, Magnetic Bed, Government Counsel, the Money Circulation Scheme, Money Circulation Scheme, the I-Schedule, the Supreme Court, Rajeev Chaudhary v. State, the Apex Court, the I-Schedule of Cr.P.C, Government Counsel, the Money Circulation Scheme, Government Counsel, Company, Government Counsel, Company, Government Counsel, the Government of Tamil Nadu, Judges of Supreme Court, the Additional Advocate General, Government Counsel, the Additional Advocate General, xerox, the Apex Court, Principal Sessions, the Principal Sessions Court, Principal Sessions, the Apex Court, the Delhi Administration, Dolat Ram and Ors, the Apex Court, Government Counsel, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, AIR SCW, The Supreme Court, State, Japan Life Company, State, State, Principal Sessions, Chennai

DATE: 2003, 2003, 5, 1978, 24.1.2003, 2003, 29.1.2003, 1978, 1978, the year ending 31.3.2002, 1978, six months, 23.1.2003, 11, 24.1.2003, three years, three years, three years, 2001, less than ten years', ten years', 10 years, less than 10 years, three years, more than 7 years, less than 3 years, three years, three years, 23.1.2003, 1978, 1995, 1999, 2001, 1687, 2002, 2003, 29.1.2003, 2003

CARDINAL: 2, one, 16, 6, 3 and 4, 1, 880, 3., more than one, 10, 4., 5, 3, 5, 5, 6., 8, one, three, two, three, 9, three, two, 10, 10, two, 12, 4, 13, 14, 3.8.1970, 420, 15, two, 10.5.2002, 16, 17, 1, 1978CriLJ952, 2, 1978CriLJ844, 3, 1984CriLJ160, 4, 1992CriLJ3712, 5, 237, 6, 439(2, 18, 1980CriLJ1125, 2, 457, 19, 20, about 80, 21.The, more than one, 22, 880

PERSON: K. Jayaraman, Jayaraman, K. Abudu, Kumar Rajarathinam, A. Natarajan, Jayaraman, Senthil Murugan, Senthil Murugan, Senthil Murugan, Water Purifier, Sanjay Gandhi, Mohan Singh v. Union Territory, Chandigarh, Bhagirathsinh Judeja v. State, Aslam Babalal Desai v. State, Subhendu Mishra v. Subrat, Kumar Mishra, Anr, Anil Sharma, Ram Govind Vpadhyay v., Sudarshan Singh

WORK_OF_ART: Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning, Herbal Life', the Scheme of the Company, awayonly Water Purifier, Ozone Water Purifier

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first

EVENT: the Criminal Procedure Code