Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

In Re: Nagaraja Moopanar

Decided On : Oct-13-1927

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 16, Section 11, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11(2)(i

PERSON: ORDERMadhavan Nair, it.6, Ganapathi

NORP: J.1, Ramanujapuram

ORG: This Criminal Revision Petition, the Joint Magistrate of Kumbakonam, the Motor Vehicles Rules, Kapisthalam, the Local Government, Court, Government, the Local Government, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Local Government, Government, the Madras Motor Vehicles Rules, the Local Government, the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, the Madras Motor Vehicles Rules, the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, the Public Prosecutor, Act, The Sub-Magistrate

GPE: Cr, Kumbakonam, him.4

CARDINAL: 49, 27(c, three, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, two, 1, 2, 1, 27(c, one, 2, 2, 27(c, 100, 2)(i, 2)(i, one, 27(c

DATE: 1926, 1914, the 3rd of June, 1926, the next two days, 1914

TIME: the evening, the morning, one evening

QUANTITY: only 9 inches, only 9 inches, 6 feet

ORDINAL: third

LOC: Act.12

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //