Mohan Singh and ors. Vs. State

Decided On : Jan-03-1992

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 482 Cr, Section 320 Cr, Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 326 I.P.C., Section 320 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 326, Section 326 IPC, Section 482, The Criminal Procedure Code, Act 10, Act 5 of 1898, Section 482, Section 482 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 2(n, Section 20, the Cattle Trespass Act, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 401, Section 326 IPC, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482 Cr, Section 482, Section 482, Section 320, Section 482, Section 482, Section 561-A, Section 561-A, Section 561A, Section 561-A of the old, Section 561-A of the Code, Section 561-A., Section 561-A, Section 215, Section 561A, Section 420 IPC, Section 13, Act 45 of 1963, Section 420, Section 13 of the Maharashtra Act, Section 420 IPC, Section 13, the Maharashtra Act, Section 13, the Maharashtra Act, Section 13, the Maharashtra Act, Section 345, Section 320 of the Code 1973, Section 345, Section 320, Section 357 Cr, Section 482, Section 482, Section 357, Section 482, Section 307 IPC, Section 482, Section 482, Section 320 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 482, Article 21 of the Constitution, Section 482, Section 362, Section 362, Section 320, Section 482, Section 320 of the Code

ORG: N.L. Tibrewal, it:-i, Section 320 Cr, Section 320 Cr, Magistrate, Court, Court, Hari Narain v. State, RCC, Court, Hari Narain's, this Larger Bench, State Legislatures, the Central Law Commission, the Law Commission, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Table, Table, Court, Court of Session, Section 320 Cr, a High Court, a High Court, High Court - Nothing, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, AIR 1988, RCC 335, RCC, Court, Kailash Bahadur and Ors, Court, RLR, Court, Mammu, RLR, Public Prosecutor, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, AIR, Lahore High Court, Court, Court, AIR, Cri LJ 108, the High Court, the High Court, Legislature, AIR 1946 PC 169, Khushi Ram v. Hashim, AIR 1959, SC, High Court, Magistrate, The High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, SC, AIR 1973, SC, Cri LJ 201, the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, the High Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Supreme Court, IPC, the Supreme Court, AIR 1977 SC, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, AIR 1978, SC, the Supreme Court, the High Court, AIR 1990, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Hari Narain v. State of, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, High Court, Court, Kailash Bahadur v. State of Raj, the High Court, Bench, Bench, Court, Mammu, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court

CARDINAL: 1, 9, 1, 1000/-, 335, 26, 1898.The, 1, 1, 2, 6, 8), 9, 320, 1, two, two, 9, 1, 2, two, 9, 9, 482, 9, 174, 2/1990, 1, 1, 195, 705, 31, 979, 42, 109, one, one, 47, 542, 659, 866, two, one, two, 204, two, 9, 1, 500, 1, 9, 1, 2, 1

GPE: P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., India, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., justice.6, P.C., Mahesh Chand, Rajasthan, Rajasthan, Rajasthan, Habu v. State, Rajasthan, Noor Taki, Rajasthan, P.C., P.C., P.C., Emperor, Ramesh, Madhu, P.C., Mahesh Chand, Rajasthan, P.C., Mahesh Chand, Mahesh Chand's, Noor Taki, P.C., Habu v. State of Raj, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, Cr, P.C.

ORDINAL: second, first, third, first, third, second

PERSON: Mohan Singh, Gulab Singh, District Jaipur, Table:-, Hari Narain v. State, Shiv Nath v. State, D. B. Cr, Sukh Dev, Shadi Lal, Cri LJ, Vishnu Ghanshyam v. Emperor, Vivian Bose, J., Cri LJ, Kumar Singh Chhajor, Cri LJ):-, R. P. Kapur v. State of, Chandra v. A.P. Jhaveri, Cri LJ):-'It, Palaniappa Gounder v. State, supplied)12, Limaye, Sooraj Devi v. Pyarelal, v. Smt, Dolley Mukherjee, Shiv Nath v. State, Habu v. State of Raj, Noor Taki, P.C., and(iv, M.B. Sharma, J.16

DATE: one year, March 29, 1985, 1973, 1989, 1882, 18 of 1923, 1898, 1955, 1973, Forty-first, 1871, 45 of 1860, 45 of 1860, 1989, 1989, 1990, Aug. 16, 1987, Raj 83, 1986, 1986, 1929, 1973, 1959, 1898, 1960, 1960, 1973, 1963, 1898, 1898, 1977, 1978, 1981, 1981, 1990

LOC: Additional District

NORP: Hon'ble

WORK_OF_ART: Amendment Acts

PRODUCT: 320 Cr., Cri LJ 121, Cri LJ 1488).On, Cri LJ 977, Cri LJ 933, Cri LJ 658, Cri LJ 1239, Cri LJ 992, Cri LJ 165, Cri LJ 296, Cri LJ 1599, the Full Bench, the Full Bench of

FAC: Kailash Bahadur v. State of Raj