Chatrumal Vs. the State and anr.

Decided On : Jan-25-1972

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 342 Cr, Section 7/16, Rule 16, Rule 16, Rule 16, Section 2(1)(a, Section 2, Section 2, Section 7(1, Section 2(1)(a, Section 7 of the Act, Section 2(1)(a, Section 2(1)(a, Section 2(1)(a, Section 2(1)(a, Section 7/16, Section 7 of the Act inter alia, Rule 44

ORG: S.N. Modi, the Municipal' Magistrate, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Hathi Bhata, the Food Inspector, B.R. Value, the Municipal Council, the Court of the Municipal Magistrate, the Food Inspector In, Witness, P W 2 Shyamsunder, P W 2 Shyamsunder, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, the Food Inspector, Counsel, him.6, Public, the purchaser & is, The Public Prosecutor v., L.J. 448, the Food Inspector, Bengal gram flour &, The Food Inspector, Counsel, Court, The District Magistrate

NORP: J.1, Munikannish

PERSON: Chatrumal, Ajmer, Chatrumal, Yatindranath, S.D. Ahuja, Ajmer, Ajmer, DW1 Bhugrdmal, S.D. Ahuja, Munikanish, Bengal gram, Bengal gram, adulterated.10, Ajmer

DATE: six months, 1000/-, two month's, three months, 4th December, 1967, Rule 16, 1964, '11, today

CARDINAL: 500/-, 375, 1.40, three, three, One, three, two, 1, two, 1, two, 1, two, 16, 16, at least four, one, two, One, 1, 1, two

ORDINAL: third, first, first, first, first, second, third

GPE: P.C., Act.3, Counsel

WORK_OF_ART: PW 2 Shyamsunder, PW 3 Narainsingh, PW 2 Shyamsunder

PRODUCT: PW 2 Shyamsunder, be;It

PERCENT: 60%, 50 percent