Tejumal Vs. State - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-20-1957

Court: Rajasthan

LAW: Section 193, Section 332, Section 193 I. P. C., Section 193, the Indian Penal Code, Section 195 Cr., Section 236 Illustration B of the Cr., Section 193 I. P. C., Section 164, Section 193, Section 164, Section 332 I. P. C., Section 236, Section 18, the Evidence Act

PERSON: K.L. Bapna, I. P. C.2, Jaisingh, I. P. C., Hari Kishan, Mirchumal, Tejunial, Shanker Sharina, Yeshodeo Sharma, Mirchumal, Harikishan Dayal, Kapoor, Saieh Shah v. Crown AIR, Sultanshah Sidisha

CARDINAL: One, two, 21, 3, 21, 1, 25, two, 3., two, 1, one, two, 2, two, two, two, 1, 2, one, two, two, two, two, two, 385

ORG: Laxmandass, the Extra Magistrate, Laxmandass, Extra Magistrate, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Civil Suit, Laxmandass, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Magistrate First Class and, State, Laxmandass, Laxmandass, Extra Magistrate, Additional Sessions, Laxmandass, Court, Tejumal, Additional Sessions, Magistrate, Court, the Extra Magistrate, State, Laxmandass, the Extra Magistrate, the Extra Magistrate, Purshottam Ishvar Amin v. Emperor, AIR 1921 Bom 3 (FB, AIR 1940, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, State, Laxmandass, the Extra Magistrate, the Extra Magistrate, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate

DATE: 4-11-1953, 2542/-, 1953, 21-7-1953

NORP: Phagunmal, Phagunmal

GPE: Khanchand, Civil

ORDINAL: first, second