Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramanand Vs. Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Northern Railway and anr.

Decided On : Dec-22-1961

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: the Disciplinary Action Rules', the Disciplinary Action Rules, Chapter V, Rule 42, the Railway Establishment Code, Rule 49, Cal 40, Rule 11, the Disciplinary Action Rules', Indian Railways Act, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Article 311, the Divisional Superintendent

ORG: Ramanand under Article 226 of the Constitution, Delhi Serai Rohilla Railway Station, theDivisional Mechanical Engineer, the Divisional Mechanical Engineer, the Divisional Superintendent of the Northern Railway, the Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Delhi Serai Rohilla, the Divisional Accounts Officer, the Attendance Register, The Enquiry Committee, Reliance, the Divisional Mechanical Engineer Bikaner, the Divisional Mechanical Engineer, the Divisional Superintendent, Northern Railway, the Enquiry Committee, Sanjiwa Row's, Discipline, Codemust, Reliance, the Enquiry Officer, A.K. Vyas v. State of, ILR, Eastern Rly, AIR, SN 20 and, the Supreme Court, State of, Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1961, SC, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Lordships, Court, ILR, Railway, Trade Union of this Railway, Place/Station, Union

CARDINAL: 2., 2, 3., 1, 2, 26, 40, 3-6-57, 29, 3, 4, 96-M-0, 29, 5, 17, 4., 26, 27-6-57, 2, 4., 1, only one, at least two, 2, 3, 1, 1, 2, one, 5., 6, at least two, three, two, 8, 9, 42, two, three, 10, two, three, one, 42, two, three, 2, 6, 2, 4, 6, 5, 11, four, 2, one, 12, 1, 13, 216, 2, 21, six, 6, 49, 15, 16, as many as 17, 2, two, 6, 17, 18, 19, two, 2, 1, 2, 40, 20, 21, 1, 2, 3, 19 (4, 2., 3, three, one, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 21, 3 and 4, 1, 2, 1, 2, 23, 24

LOC: the Northern Railway, the Northern Railway

DATE: the 35th July, 1957, the 9th November, 1957, the nth March, 1958, the 29th April, 1958, a period of, two years, the 29th, these days, the 26th April, 1957, the 27th January, 1958, 1094, Rule 1707 and Rule 1730, the 25th July, 1957, Rule 1707, the 18th July, 1956, Rule 1712, Rule 1702, the 18th July, 1956, Rule 1702, the 23rd November, 1957, 1960, 10 Raj 1419, the year ending 30th June, 1953, the year 1954, the years 1955 and 1956, the past few years, '17, the 29th January, 1958, the nth March, 1958, a couple of days, the 25th of September, 1957, 1623, 1960, the 3rd June, 1957 and, 29th June, 1957, Rule 1702, seven clear days, Rule 1706/1706-R. I. Should, the 25th July, 1957, the 4th August, 1957

PERSON: Bikaner, Shri K.N. Mathur, Enquiry Officer, Bikaner, Nos, Bikaner, Bikaner, Nos, Bikaner, Bikaner, Officers, Shri Ramanand, E.N. Pol, Ram Swaroop, Ex, Bikaner, Nos, Appendix B., Appendix, Nos, Nos

NORP: P.M., Appendix, Ratan v., Rules, Indian

TIME: the night, 14.00 hours

ORDINAL: second, first, second, second, third, first, first, first, third, first

GPE: Delhi, Clauses, Clauses, Rajasthan, Chintaman, Delhi

EVENT: the Railway Establishment Code, theRailway Establishment Code

PRODUCT: Rule 42, Notes

FAC: the Enquiry Officer

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //