Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State of Rajasthan Vs. Tarachand

Decided On : Jul-17-1957

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 5, the Gambling Act, Section 173, the Gambling Act, Section 173, the Gambling Act, Section 173, Section 173, Section 3 or 4, Section 173, Section 4, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 4, Section 5 of the Rajasthan Gambling Ordinance, Section 5, section 54, Section 5, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 4, Section 173

PERSON: J.S. Ranawat, Tara Chand, Sri Jaisingh Sub-Inspector, Kotwali, Sri Jaisingh, Mathur, Queen-Empress, Ismail Hirji, Chatterjee, Mahmoodkhan Doulatkhan v. Emperor, Htwan Htin v. Emperor, Raghunath Lahanusa Walvekar, G).6, a District Superintendent of Police, Second Schedule, Mathur, Chatterjee, Davis C. J., Criminal P. C.

NORP: J.1, Tarachand, Nagarmal Jankiram

ORG: State, the Prosecuting Sub-Inspector, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Court, Magistrate, State, Magistrate, ILR, AlR, Maroti v. Emperor, State, Sections 4 and, AIR 1942 Sind, AIR 1935 Rang 181, AIR 1932 Bom, Sections 3 and 4 of the Gambling Act, Magistrate, the State Government, place;and, Legislature, AIR 1942, AIR 1932 Bom, AIR 1942 Sind, the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, Legislature, Schedule 2, the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate

GPE: Jaipur, Jaipur, Jaipur, Magistrates, case.10

DATE: 1st June, 1956, May, 1956, 1930, less than one year

FAC: the District Superintendent of Police, the District Superintendent of Police, the Rajasthan Gambling Ordinance

ORDINAL: 5th, firstly, secondly

WORK_OF_ART: the Prosecuting Sub-Inspector

CARDINAL: 4, 4, 27, 7, 610, 4, 1, 1, 9, 4, one, 610, 1

TIME: night

LOC: the District Superintendent of Police

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //