Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State of Rajasthan Vs. Ram Kishan

Decided On : May-06-1977

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Article 56 of the First Schedule of the Indian Limitation Act, Article 115.2, Article 56, Article 56, Article 56, Article 56, Article 115.10, Pun LR 166).11, Article 56 of the Limitation Act, Article 56 of the Limitation Act, Article 56, Article 56, Article 56.17, the Article of the Limitation Act, Article 56, Article 52 nor Article 56, Article 120.'19, Article 52, Article 56.'That, Article 56, Article 115, the Limitation Act, Article 115, Article 115, Article 115, Article 115, Article 56, Article 56, Article 115, Article 120.27, Article 120 of the Limitation Act, Article 56 or, Article 115, Article 56, Article 115.29, Article 56 of the First Schedule of the Indian, Article 115and

PERSON: Actg, Shanker v. State, Tej Singh v. State, Guda Tank, Bundi, i. e. 9-12-1957, Shri Shisodia, Shri Agrawal, Shri Agrawal, Lal Ganga Prasad, Abdul AH v., F. Von Goldstein, Zilla Partshad, Shanti Devi, Subbaraju v. Village Panchayat, Shyamlal Gupta, Shame, Radha Kishan v. Basantlal, Mohomed Ghasita, Shriniwas v. Hanmant, Shadi Lal C. J., Radha Kishan, Basant Lal, Mohomed Ghasita, Gajjen Singh, Subordinate, Shankar v. State, Narayan C. J., Mahomed Ghasita v. Sirajuddin, Sita Ram v. Mt. Mahmudi Begam, Tej Singh, Narayan C. J., Shankar v. State, Government

ORG: Clauses, Court, the State Government of Rajasthan, the Irrigation Department, Project in Bundi, the 'G' Schedule, Engineer, Rupees 85,218, Bundi, The State Government, inter alia, Additional Government Advocate, Court, Additional Government Advocate, Mathura Prasad v. Chairman, District Board, Sitapur, AIR 1928 Oudh, Cantonment Board, Allahabad, District Board, AIR 1965, Andh Pra, the State of Punjab v., Clauses, Building Contracts, Clauses, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Clauses, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Labour, Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edn, 6th Edn, High Courts, Sundaram & Co., the Lahore High Court, ILR, the Lahore High Court, ILR, Lordships, Sitaram, Mt. Mahmudi Begam, AIR 1922, State, AIR 1935 Lah 775, the Military Department, the Military Department, the Engineering Department, the Government Advocate, The Government Advocate, Engineer, Engineer, The Government Advocate, the Calcutta High Court, M.L. Dalmiya, Co. v. Union of India, Court, Clauses, Court, Engineer, Government, AIR 1922, M.L. Dalmiya, Co. v. Union of India, Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd., Union of India, AIR 1970 SC 1433, Lordships, Lordships, Engineer, Lordships, Additional Government Advocate, Lordships, Gannon Dunker'ey & Co. Ltd v. Union of India, AIR 1970 SC 1433, supra).28, the Supreme Court, Gannon Dankerley & Co. Ltd., Union of India, AIR 1970 SC 1433, Lordships, Clauses, Engineer, Lordships

CARDINAL: 6, two, 268, 5, 7, 22, three, three, 10-5-1955, 5, 1, 5, 7, 7, 436, 4, 590, 186, 73, 6, 6, 6.--Final, one thousand, one thousand, 13, 6, 8, 597.14, one, 24, 218, 6, 436, 56, 22, 576, 1914, 250, 2, 376, 198, two, one, 24, 260, two, two, two, 1914, 250, 475, 198, 23, 6, 7, 6, 6, 268, 198, 475, 2, 268, 6, 7),as

DATE: 1908, 1971, 9-12-1957, 4 months of the date, 24-10-1961, the month of February 1960, 3 years, 24-10-1961, 1909, 1965, 1971, monthly, one month, monthly, one month, 1873, 1780, 1886, 1st March, September 1881, 25th January 1884, '18, 1921, '21, 3 years, three years, three years, 1963, one month, 1963, 1971, 1908

GPE: Rajasthan, Baori, San Paulo Railway Co., England, India, Halsbury, Clauses, India, XX, Rajasthan, Rajasthan

NORP: Pench

PERCENT: 16%, 11%, 4%

PRODUCT: Rupees 85,000.5, 9 Mad 334, The Full Bench, the Full Bench, Rustomji

WORK_OF_ART: 'The Law of Limitation and Adverse Possession'

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //