Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

C. Dhanapalan Vs. Cit

Decided On : Aug-22-2001

Court : Kerala

LAW: the Finance Act, Section 95 of the Finance, section 88, section 245D, the Income Tax Act, section 22D, the Income Tax Act, section 264 of the Act, a Division Bench, the Finance Act, article 226, Chapter IV, section 154, section 154

ORG: the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, Scheme, The Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the Settlement Commission, the Supreme Court, Emphasis, Appellate, Thiruvananthapuram, Ext, Ext, Ext, Scheme, Ext, Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Renuka Datla, CIT, Scheme, the Supreme Court, the KVS Scheme, the KVS Scheme, the KVS Scheme, CIT, Scheme, the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Ext, Scheme, Scheme, the Apex Court, CTO, Apex Court

DATE: 1998, 1998, 1998, 24-12-1985, almost four years, more than four years, almost three years, 1961, 8-12-1993, 1998, the 1960s, 23-12-1993, 1975, 24-10-1996

CARDINAL: 95, 4, 4, 16, 18, 7, 23-11-1993, 8-12-1993, 23-12-1993, 24, 23-12-1993, 3-9-1998, two, 1999]240ITR463(AP, 471, 1999]237ITR655(KAR, 662, 4, 28-10-1998, 2-11-1998, only four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 35, 1, 8, 23-12-1993

GPE: Kollam, Sankarasubban

TIME: 9-11-1993.Thereafter

PERSON: Shri N. Venkatarama Iyer, George K. George, Gopal Films v. Dy, John Thoppil v., Cotton Corpn

ORDINAL: firstly

WORK_OF_ART: Scheme, Code

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //