Semantic Analysis by spaCy
C. Dhanapalan Vs. Cit
Decided On : Aug-22-2001
Court : Kerala
LAW: the Finance Act, Section 95 of the Finance, section 88, section 245D, the Income Tax Act, section 22D, the Income Tax Act, section 264 of the Act, a Division Bench, the Finance Act, article 226, Chapter IV, section 154, section 154
ORG: the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, Scheme, The Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the Settlement Commission, the Supreme Court, Emphasis, Appellate, Thiruvananthapuram, Ext, Ext, Ext, Scheme, Ext, Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Renuka Datla, CIT, Scheme, the Supreme Court, the KVS Scheme, the KVS Scheme, the KVS Scheme, CIT, Scheme, the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Ext, Scheme, Scheme, the Apex Court, CTO, Apex Court
DATE: 1998, 1998, 1998, 24-12-1985, almost four years, more than four years, almost three years, 1961, 8-12-1993, 1998, the 1960s, 23-12-1993, 1975, 24-10-1996
CARDINAL: 95, 4, 4, 16, 18, 7, 23-11-1993, 8-12-1993, 23-12-1993, 24, 23-12-1993, 3-9-1998, two, 1999]240ITR463(AP, 471, 1999]237ITR655(KAR, 662, 4, 28-10-1998, 2-11-1998, only four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 35, 1, 8, 23-12-1993
GPE: Kollam, Sankarasubban
TIME: 9-11-1993.Thereafter
PERSON: Shri N. Venkatarama Iyer, George K. George, Gopal Films v. Dy, John Thoppil v., Cotton Corpn
ORDINAL: firstly
WORK_OF_ART: Scheme, Code