Johnson Scaria Vs. State of Kerala

Decided On : Aug-08-2006

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 138, the N.I Act, Section 138, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 228, Section 114, the Evidence Act, the Constitution Bench, Section 114, the Evidence Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 105 of the Evidence Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 114, the Evidence Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 3 of the Evidence Act, Section 3 of the Evidence Act, Section 4, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 4 of the Evidence Act, Section 3 of the Evidence Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 138, Section 114 of the Evidence Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 139, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 138, the NI Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 39, the NI Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 114, the Evidence Act, Section 139, the N.I. Act, Section 3, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 3 of the Evidence Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 139 of the N.I. Act, Section 139 and Section 139, the N.I. Act, Section 114, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 139, Section 139, Section 3 of the Evidence Act, Section 105 of the Evidence Act, Section 133, Section 138, Section 139, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 357(3

ORG: ORDERR, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, KLT 404, SC, Ext, Ext, Ext, Judicial, Court, State, Court, AIR p.580, V.D. Jhingan v. State, Court, Sections 138, Court, The Honourable Judges, the Supreme Court, Consequence, Court, Ext, Ext, Court, Ext, Dhana Lakshmi, Ext, 31.8.2002, Ext, the Honourable Judges of, the Supreme Court, Lordships, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, contra, Court, R.P., Rupees Two Lakhs Twenty Thousand, SI, Magistrate, Magistrate

PERSON: J.1, Bench, Hiten P. Delal v., Bratindranath Banerjee, Exts, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Hiten P. Dalai v. Bratindranath Banerjee, Kerala.10, Hiten P. Dalai v. Bratindranath Banerjee, Kundan Lal Rallaram v. Custodian, Dhanyantrai, Kalwantrai Desai v. State, Madras, Vaidyanatha Iyer, Ram Krishna Bedu Rane v. State, Hiten P. Dalal, Bratindranath Banerjee, Bench, Bench, Probable, Bench, Bench, Hiten P. Dalai v. Bratindranath Banerjee, Hiten P. Dalai v. Bratindranath Banerjee, Hiten P. Dalai v. Bratindranath Banerjee, Hiten P. Dalal, Bratindranath Banerjee, Narayana Menon, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, Jose Paul, D7, Jose Paul, Jose Paul

CARDINAL: 3, 3, 31.8.2002, 3, one, 3, 3, 31.8.2002, three, 6, 3, 404, 24, two, two, 12).(See, 46, 47, 2001CriLJ4647, 3, 139, 3, 2, 3, 47, 3, two, one, two, two, PW.1.18, 3.7.2001, 1, DWs, 1 to 3, DWs, 1, DWs, 1, 31.8.02, three, three, 1, 2, One, one, 313, 3, 852, three

GPE: Narayana, Menon, Karala, Narayana, Menon, Kerala, Narayana, Menon, Kerala, Narayana, Menon, para, Narayana, Kerala, Narayana, Menon, Kerala, Narayana, Menon, Kerala, Narayana, Menon, Kerela, Narayana, Menon, Kerala, Narayana, Menon, Kerala, DW.3, Narayana, Menon, Kerala, Anilkumar, part;b, P.C.

DATE: 2006, that day, 2006, 15.4.2002, today, 2002, 2002, a period of 3 months

FAC: the N.I. Act.3

TIME: morning

MONEY: 46 & 47

ORDINAL: first, first, second, third

PRODUCT: Bench, Section 138, Section 138

NORP: contra, contra, contra, upheld;c

LOC: principle.15