Thomas Vs. Florance - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided On : Jul-27-2006

Court : Kerala

LAW:

Section 20, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 39, Section 39, Section 20, Section 19:(i)(a, Section 19, Section 19, Section 20, the Court Fees Act, Section 20, Section 21, Section 19, Section 19

PERSON:

ORDERKurian Joseph, Thrissur, Lok, a Lok Adalat, a Lok Adalat, a Lok Adalat, Lok, Adalath

NORP:

J.1

FAC:

the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat:Provided, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat

ORG:

the Principal Munsiff Court, the Legal Services Authorities Act, the Taluk Legal Services Authority, the Munsiff Court, the Munsiff Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Munsiff Court, the Munsiff Court, the Legal Services Authorities Act, Authority or Committee, the Munsiff Court, the Munsiff Court, the Munsiff Court, the Legal Services Authorities Act, the Legal Services Authorities Act, -(i, the Munsiff Court, the Munsiff Court, the Sub Court, the Sub Court, the Munsiff Court, the Munsiff Court, the Sub Court, Court, the Munsiff Court, this Civil Revision Petition

GPE:

Thrissur, Lok Adalat, Thrissur, O.S., Thrissur, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, Clause, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, Thrissur, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, Adalat, Thrissur

DATE:

1987, six months, 1987, 1870, 1987, 1987

PERCENT:

12%

CARDINAL:

20.3.2004, 260000/-, 3, 5, 2, 3, 1, 7, 1870).(2, 260000/-, 5