Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

NitIn Nagpal Vs. State

Decided On : Jul-03-2006

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 167(2, Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 167(2, Section 309, Section 173(2, Section 39, the Arms Act, Section 173(2, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 39, the Arms Act, Section 167 of the Code ', Section 302/307 IPC, Section 167 of the Code, Section 173(2, Section 2(r, Section 173, Section 39, the Arms Act, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Chapter XXXIII, Chapter, Section 437(5, Section 439(2, Section 167(2, Section 309(2, Section 437(5, Section 439(2, Section 437(5, Section 167(2, Section 309(2, Section 437(5, Section 190(1)(b, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 173(5, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 173(5, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 173(5, Section 173(5, Section 167(2, Section 173 of the Code, Section 173 of the Code, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 167(2, Section 437(1, Section 167, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 309, Section 167(2, Section 309(2, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 173(2, Section 167(2, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 173 of the Code, Section 173, Section 173, Section 173 of the Code, Section 173, Section 173 of the Code, Section 293, Section 173 of the Code, the Arms Act, the Arms Act, the Arms Act, Section 309(2, Section 207, Section 207, Section 154, Section 161(3, Section 164, Section 173(5, Section 190, Section 190, Section 193, Section 209, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207 and Section 209, Section 207, Section 209, Section 207, Chapter xviii, Section 226, Section 226, Section 207, Section 207, Section 207, Section 170, Section 2(g, Section 309, Section 309, Section 170, Section 209, Section 207, Section 309 Cr, Section 207/209 of the Code, Section 2(g, Section 209 of the Code, Section 207, Section 209 of the Code, Section 209, Section 319, Section 209 CrPC, Section 170, Section 207, Section 2(g, Section 209 CrPC, Section 167(2, Section 167 of the Code, Section 209 of the Code, Section 167(2, Section 309(2, Section 209 of the Code, Section 309(2, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 309(2, Section 309(2, Section 309(2, Section 309(2, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, Section 173(2, Section 25, the Arms Act, Section 190(1)(b, Chapter XVI, Section 207, Section 167(2, Section 209 of the Code, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 209, Section 204, Section 204 of the Code, Section 209 and 309(2, Section 209, Section 39, the Arms Act, Section 209 of the Code, Section 309(2, Section 309(2, Section 209 of the Code, Constitution Bench, Section 167(2, Section 439 of the Code, Section 167(2, Section 439

PERSON: Durrez Ahmed, J.1, Giriraj Kishore, IPC, I.O., Ranbir Singh, Ranvir Singh, Siddarth Bansal, Delhi Admn, Andley, Andley, Challan, Mr Andley, Andley, Andley, Raghubir Singh, Parida Batakrushna Parida, Babaji Parida, Bashir, Haryana, Talab Haji Hussain v., Madhukar Purshottam Mondkar, Anr, Raghubir Singh, Andley, Sunil Vasantrao Phulbande, Anr, Aslam Babalal Desai v. State, Natabar Parida, Orissa, Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of, Singh v. State, C. Venkataraddy, Matchumari China Venkatareddy, Sharadchandra Vinayak, Ganja, Aslam Babalal Desai, Natabar Parida, Kumar Sharma v. State, Mahaveer Singh, Pawan Sharma, Taj Singh v. State, Pawan Sharma, Kumar Sharma v., Sharma, Sharma, Lakshmi Brahman, Pawan Sharma, Lakshmi Brahman's, Gyamu Madhu's, Balappa Karnal's, Lakshmi Brahman's, Reasons, Andley, Sunil Sharma, Sunil Sharma, Prakash, Sanjay Dutt v. State, Mohd, Iqbal Madar, Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State, Kumar Sharma, Thamisharasi, Matabar Parida, Kumar Sharma, Kumar Sharma, Andley, Ganja, Ganja, Taj Singh, Magistrate, Kumar Sharma, Court, Kumar Sharma, Sanjay Datt, Ram Narayan, A.K. Gopalan v. Government

PRODUCT: the 'Code', DLT 3, Section 437(5, Section 439

DATE: 90 days, 90 days, the period of, 90 days, the period of, 90 days, this day, the 89th day, this day, 1959, today, 1959, 16.12.2005, 90 days, 90 days, 1987, 90 days, 1989, 90 days, 2(r, 90 days, the period of, 90 days, 1959, The 90 day, that day, 1986, 1987CriLJ157, 90 days, 2001, 1992, 1989, 1993, 1985, 1985, 60 days, 90 days, 60 days, 90 days, 90 days, 60 days, 60 days, 90 days, 90 days, 90 days, 90 days, 33, 1987, S. 2(r, 90 days, 1959, 1959, 1244/2005, 27.6.2005, 13, '14, 2996, 382-83, the day, between 25.4.2005, 16 days, fifteen days', 1959, 89th day, 90 days, 21.9.2005, 90 days, the same day, today, 27.3.2006, this very day, the day

ORG: Counsel for the State, House, ASI, the Additional SHO, Constable Dharampal and Constable Devinder, FIR, Sections, Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, the Central Forensic Science Laboratory Report, the Metropolitan Magistrate, J/C. Fresh, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Custody, Metropolitan Magistrate, CFSL, Metropolitan Magistrate, Sections 302/307/393/353/186/332/120B/34 IPC & 25, CFSL, Metropolitan Magistrate, the CFSL Report, State, inter alia, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, inter alia, Nitin Nagpal, DCP, CFSL, the Court of Sessions.13.2.2006: The, Additional Sessions, CFSL, Metropolitan Magistrate, Court, ASJ, CFSL, ASJ, Court, Vinay Chaudhary v. State, ASJ, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Court of Sessions, Court, Sections 167(2, Magistrate, Magistrate, The CFSL Report, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, decisions:1 Shardchandra Vinayak Dongre and Ors, Maharashtra 2, State of Andhra Pradesh, SC).7, Narayan, Ors, Rajasthan 1993 Crimes, Khimbhadhur Palshuram Thapa, Bail Application, the Bombay High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Sunil Vasantrao Phulbande, the Bombay High Court, the Chemical Analyser's Report, the Bombay High Court, Court, Court, The Bombay High Court, Sunil Vasantrao Phulbande, the Chemical Analyser's Report, Magistrate, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Court, Magistrate, Court, under:.The, Magistrate, Court, Court, The Bombay High Court, Magistrate, Court, the Chemical Analyser's Report, the Chemical Analyser's Report, the Narcotic Drug, Court, Magistrate, the Chemical Analyser's Report, the Chemical Analyser's Report, the Supreme Court, inter alia, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Legislature, Court, Uday Mohanlal Acharya, the Supreme Court, the Investigating Agency, Magistrate, Ors, Court, Court, Rajasthan High Court, Khimbhadhur Palshuram Thapa, the Bombay High Court, State, CFSL, Court, the Central Forensic Science Laboratory, inter alia, Magistrate, Magistrate, CFSL, Government Scientific Expert, the Government Scientific Experts, Chemical Examiner, Haffkeine Institute, Bombay;(e, a Central Forensic Science Laboratory, CFSL, CFSL, CFSL, CFSL, investigation.9, the Sanction under Section 39, Counsel for the State, the CFSL Report, Metropolitan Magistrate, State, Bail Application, Magistrate, the First Information Report, Statements, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, the Court of Session, Court, the Court of Session, Counsel for the State, the Court of Session, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, State, U.P., Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Magistrate, Bonds, the High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, The High Court, Magistrate, Court of Session, the High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Court of Session, the Court of Session, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, High Court, Sections 167(2, Government Advocate, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banda, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Court of Session, the Supreme Court, Karnataka IV (, CCR, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, the Supreme Court, Raj Kiishore Prasad, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Raj Kishore Prasad, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, The Supreme Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Sections 207, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, State, U.P. v. Lakshmi Brahman1, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Statement of ', Court, Magistrate, Bench, Court, the Supreme Court, CBI, Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of, Court, the Supreme Court, UOI, Court, Sections 167, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Court, High Courts, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, CrPC, CFSL, the Bombay High Court, Sunil Vasantrao Phulbande, the Bombay High Court, the Chemical Analyser's, the Chemical Analyser's Report, Magistrate, a Psychotropic Substance, the Chemical Analysis, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Court, Division Bench, CFSL, Sections 307/302/34 IPC, the Bombay High Court, Magistrate, CFSL, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Sections 167(2, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Metropolitan Magistrate, CFSL, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Court of Session, the Sessions Court, the Supreme Court

CARDINAL: 1, 2, one, 419, 1959.20.9.2005, 1, one, 2, 3, 20.9.2005, 7.10.2005, three, 31/10/05, 31.10.2005.31.10.2005, 17.11.2005.17.11.2005, 16.12.2005, 12.12.2005, Three, 1, 2, 3, 33, 173, 2, 20.9.2005, one, 20.9.2005, 21.9.2005, 4.10.2005, 20.9.2005, 18.10.2005, 20, 1978CriLJ173, 1958CriLJ701, 4, 1989)IILLJ591SC .5, 2, 452, 322 .8, 3, 479.9, 3, 543.10, 3, 955.5, 1980CriLJ227, 1980CriLJ227, 173(5, 5, 5, 5, 2, 439(1, 439(2, 20.9.2005, 20.9.2005, 3, 1, 2, 2)(i)(a, 2)(i)(a, 2, 4, 4, 2, 18.10.2005, 18.10.2005, 209, 1983CriLJ839, 12, 14, 209, 2, three, 2, 209, 309, 26, 1996CriLJ2523, 208, 208, 13):The, 20.9.2005, 121(2005)DLT686, 1995CriLJ477, 1996CriLJ1652, 1996]1SCR183, 2001CriLJ1832, 1, 1996(54)ECC7, 2, 309, two, 1, 2, 12, 26.4.2005, 25.4.2005, 26.4.2005, 26.4.2005, 26.4.2005, 20.9.2005, one, 20.9.2005, 204, 209, 18.10.2005, only under three, 21.9.2005, 21.9.2005, up to 18.10.2005, 209, 4.10.2005, 18.10.2005, 18.10.2005, 18.10.2005, 4.10.2005, 16.12.2005, 18.10.2005, 18.10.2005, 30.1.2006, 442, 1952CriLJ656, 1953CriLJ113, 1966CriLJ602, 20

TIME: about 12.10 p.m., 20.9.2005 i.e.

GPE: New Delhi, J.C., Taj, Matabar, Sharadchandra Vinayak, Satya, Musadi v. State of Bihar, Narayan, Sunil, Clauses, Sharma, Sunil, Sections, Dorai v. State, P.C., Bombay, Gujarat, Sunil, Sunil, Sunil, Taj, Sunil Kumr Sharma, Sunil, P.C., Sunil, Singh v. State, Delhi

QUANTITY: 27/54/59 A. Act

WORK_OF_ART: 24/10/05.24.10.2005, The Madhya Pradesh High Court, State of Punjab

LOC: Single, Chapter XXXIII

EVENT: Section 167(2

NORP: Serologist, Sharma

ORDINAL: 41st, secondly, second, first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //