Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

S. Lal and Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Decided On : Jul-01-1996

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Arbitration Act, the Evidence Act, Rlr 14, Rlr 14

ORG: Lokeshwar Prasad, Sections 14 & 17, Court, Court, Court, Delhi Development Authority, DDA, Sections 30 & 33, Court, the Court of an award, The Supreme Court, Food Corporation of India, Arbitrators, Courts, The Supreme Court, the Court of an award, Raipur Development Authority & Ors, Chokhamal Contractors & Ors, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Municipal Corporation, Delhi v. M/s. Jagannath Ashok Kumar & Another, Court, Court, Court, The Supreme Court, DDA, Arbitrator, Bharat Furnishing Company, Delhi Development Authority & Anr, Arbitrator, Delhi Development Authority v. M/s. Alkaram, College of Vocational Studies, Arbitrator, Sudershan Trading Co. v. Government of Kerala, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., Court, Court, Court, State, Rajasthan v. Puri Construction Co. Ltd., the Apex Court, Arbitrator, Bharat Furnishing Company, Delhi Development Authority & Anr, Court, Court, Superintending Engineer, the Superintending Engineer of the Delhi Development Authority, Arbitrator, Clause 2 of the Agreement, Arbitrator, Superintending Engineer, Superintending Engineer, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Department, Engineer, the Superintending Engineer, the Supreme Court, Arbitrator, the Supreme Court, Hindustan Construction Company Limited v. State of, Jammu & Kashmir, the Supreme Court, Irrigation Department of, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, the Superintending Engineer, Court

DATE: 1940, 4.2.1992, the 27th December, 1991, today, 1872, 1995, 1987, 1995, 1995, the 27th December, 1991, eight weeks, eight weeks

PERSON: Shri S.C. Gupta, S.C. Gupta, S.C. Gupta, Dda, Dda, Dda, -DDA, Dda, Joginder Pal Mohinder Pal & Another, Dda, Dda, Dda, Minny Enterprises, G. M., L.R., S.S. Jaitley, Dda, C. Rajashekhar Rao, Dda, Minny Enterprises, G. M., L.R. 327, Dda, Dda, Dda, Dda, Dda, Dda, Dda, S.C., Dda, Vishwanath Sood v. Union, Dda, DDA, Dda, Bench, G.C. Roy, Dda, S.C. Gupta, Dda

CARDINAL: 2, 2, 2, 4.5.92, 2, 1(B, 3, 8, 3, 4, 6608/93, 5, 24.3.94, 1, 6608/93, 2, 6, 1, 1989]1SCR880, two, 8), 1988]1SCR180, 3 to 5, 1(D, 6 to 8, 3, 8), 12, 13, 1(B, 1992(1, 327, 134, 11, 1989]1SCR665, 1, 1, 13, 50,000.00, 1992(1, 14, 15, 1(D, 15,054.00, 16, 12,889.00, 12,889.00, 25.10.89, 3.11.89, 17, 10.5.91, 12,889.00, 10.5.91, 12,889.00, 1989]1SCR288, 2, 19, 50,000.00, 20, Five, 21, 12,889.00

NORP: respondent/

GPE: India, Itdc, New Delhi, Itdc, Orissa

EVENT: 9 & 10, Clause 25

QUANTITY: 0.07 cu

TIME: 10.5.91 i.e.

PERCENT: 12 %

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //