Upaid Systems Limited Vs. Satyam Computer Services and anr.

Decided On : Jul-17-2009

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 78, Order 26, Order 26 Rule, Article 253 of the Constitution of India, Article 253, Constitutional, Article 73, Constitution, Constitution, the Rule 20, Article 16 of the Convention, Article 18, Article 15, Article 23 of the Convention, Article 23 of the Convention, Article 23-, Rule 19, Rule 19, Rule 16, Article 9 of the convention, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 78: Commissions, Order 26 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Rule 20, Order 26, Rule 19, Article 253, Order 26, Order 26, Order 26, Order 26 Rule 22, Order 26, Rule 19, Rule 16, Rule 15, Order 26, Rule 19, Order 26 Rule 19, Order 11 Rules 12

PERSON: S. Ravindra Bhat, Upaid, Order XXVI Rule, Satyam, Satyam, Satyam, Satyam, Satyam, Kesoram, Satyam, Order XXVI Rules, Satyam, Common Law countries.8, Upaid, Order XXVI, Order, Satyam, Order XXVI Rule, Order, Satyam, Satyam, Satyam, Order, Rule 16, Schedule, Satyam, Satyam, Murat Anstalt and, M.L. Sethi, R.P. Kapoor, Upaid, Jayant Tripathi

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

CARDINAL: 19 and 20, 19 to 22, 2004]266ITR721(SC, two, 494, 82, one, 1, 2, between two, 14, 19 to 22, four, 19 to 22, 19, three, 19, 17, 19 to 22, 3, 8, 10, 11, 1, 716, 19, 19, 22, 20, 21, 22, 1, 18, 19 to 22, 1932.15, one, 19, 216, 19, 1, 18, about three, 6,15, 16, 1, 17, 18(1, 18, One, 19, 1, 414, 2, 392, 2, 2, 19, 14, 1973]1SCR697, 321, 2, more than one, 127/2009

DATE: 1908, 1970, 1969]3SCR254, 1969, 1970, 16, 1985, 1970, 21, 15, 17, 18, 15, 17, 18, Rule 16, 1982, 1981, 1964, 9891871186 9891871186, 27th July, 2009

ORG: CPC, Texas Marshall Division, National Association of Software, Services Company, Upaid, NASSCOM, Upaid, NASSCOM, Upaid, Upaid, NASSCOM, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Court, Letters Rogatory, Court, Upaid, the Letters Rogatory, Court, Court, Upaid, Upaid, Court, the Hague Convention on Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil, Parliament, Court, State, Kesoram Industries, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Parliament, Corocraft, International Law, The Judicial Committee, the Government of the day, Parliament, Parliament, State, Parliament, State, Union, Parliament, State, State, State, Parliament, State, the Order XXVI Rules, the High Court, it,(b, the High Court's, the High Court, Court, the Central Authority, Contracting Party, State, the Central Authority, the District Court, Letters of Request, the Letter of Request, Letters of Request, Court, Parliament, Court, Commission, Court, NASSCOM, i.e:1, NASSCOM, NASSCOM, and4, NASSCOM, Court, NASSCOM, NASSCOM, Upaid, Clauses 7, the Letters Rogatory, the Letters Rogatory, Wooster Products Inc., Magum International, Letters Rogatory, NASSCOM, Court, documents;(3, Letters Rogatory, Court, CPC, the Central Government, State, High Court, Commission, a High Court, it,(b, the High Court's, the High Court, the Central Government, the High Court, the Central Government, the High Court, The High Court, the State Government, State, the High Court, Commissions, the High Court, the Central Government, Indian Courts, Parliament, Parliament, CPC, Court, the Supreme Court, CPC, Court, Canadian Supreme Court, Court, Royal American Shows, Inc., Court, Penn-Texas Corporation, the Canadian Court's, CPC, NASSCOM, NASSCOM, Court, Registry, Court

GPE: the United States, NASSCOM').2, British Virgin Islands Corporation, India, Maganbhai v. Union of India, India, Maganbhai, Canada, the British Empire, States, the British Empire, treaty.6, India, the Hague Convention, India, The Republic of India, India, Counsel, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, United States of America, al., Zingre, India, Dasti

LOC: the Eastern District, Convention

ORDINAL: first, firstly, secondly, third, second

PRODUCT: that:491, GovernmentRule, Rule 16

FAC: Constitutional

LANGUAGE: English, English

WORK_OF_ART: The Queen