Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India

Decided On : Mar-01-1997

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 164 of the Army Act, Section 164(2, the Army Act, Rule 112

PERSON: Dalveer Bhandari, Lucknow, Court Martial, Rule, A.M., Rajeev Joshi, Adjutant Rsd, Lucknow, Hawaldar Hardev Prasad, B)To, C)To, Lucknow, Scm, M. Naik, Dhq Po New Delhi-11, Sharma, Martial, Mishra, Mishra, Rajeev Joshi, Mishra, period.(17, B.C. Chaturvedi

CARDINAL: 26.5.92, 3.6.92, 16.11.93, 21.12.93, 16.11.93, 21.12.93, 16.11.91, 24.4.92, 23.4.92, 10.30, 2.Absenting, 3, 5, 1500, 23.4.92.(6, 17.8.94, 31, 92, 2.Except, 17.8.94, 29.10.94.(9, 7.10.94, 31.8.94, 10, 11, 31.8.94, 13, 112.Objection, 14, 15, 31.8.94, 31.8.92, 18, 19, 31.8.94

ORG: the Summary Court Martial, Army, Adjutant, Adjutant, Naib Sub, The Central Government, Shri B.P. Ojha, Reserve Supply Depot, the Central Government, the Additional Directorate General Discipline & Vigilance, Adjutant General's, Army Headquarters, Government of India, Government, THEaccused, Adjutant, the Court Martial, The Competent authority, B.C. Chaturvedi, Union of India, Union of India, Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal

DATE: February, 1994, 19.3.83, that day, one year, 1950, 1950, one year, one year

LOC: Hawaldar, Govt

GPE: B.A., Iii, R.I.

TIME: the afternoon

ORDINAL: first, second, third

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //