Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India
Decided On : Mar-01-1997
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 164 of the Army Act, Section 164(2, the Army Act, Rule 112
PERSON: Dalveer Bhandari, Lucknow, Court Martial, Rule, A.M., Rajeev Joshi, Adjutant Rsd, Lucknow, Hawaldar Hardev Prasad, B)To, C)To, Lucknow, Scm, M. Naik, Dhq Po New Delhi-11, Sharma, Martial, Mishra, Mishra, Rajeev Joshi, Mishra, period.(17, B.C. Chaturvedi
CARDINAL: 26.5.92, 3.6.92, 16.11.93, 21.12.93, 16.11.93, 21.12.93, 16.11.91, 24.4.92, 23.4.92, 10.30, 2.Absenting, 3, 5, 1500, 23.4.92.(6, 17.8.94, 31, 92, 2.Except, 17.8.94, 29.10.94.(9, 7.10.94, 31.8.94, 10, 11, 31.8.94, 13, 112.Objection, 14, 15, 31.8.94, 31.8.92, 18, 19, 31.8.94
ORG: the Summary Court Martial, Army, Adjutant, Adjutant, Naib Sub, The Central Government, Shri B.P. Ojha, Reserve Supply Depot, the Central Government, the Additional Directorate General Discipline & Vigilance, Adjutant General's, Army Headquarters, Government of India, Government, THEaccused, Adjutant, the Court Martial, The Competent authority, B.C. Chaturvedi, Union of India, Union of India, Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal
DATE: February, 1994, 19.3.83, that day, one year, 1950, 1950, one year, one year
LOC: Hawaldar, Govt
GPE: B.A., Iii, R.I.
TIME: the afternoon
ORDINAL: first, second, third