Pranay Kumar Soni Vs. the Chairman, U.P.S.C. and anr.

Decided On : Apr-25-2003

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 3(q, Section 14, the Industrial Disputes Act, Article 323A of the Constitution, Article 323A, Article, Article, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14, Section 14, Section 2(q, Section 14, Section 14(1)(a, Section 14.10, Section 28, Section 28, Section 14, Article 323A of the Constitution of India, Administrative Tribunal Act, Section 15(1, Article 323-A of the Constitution the Parliament, Section 14, Section 28, the Administrative Tribunals Act, Section 2, the Administrative Tribunals Act, the Administrative Tribunals Act

PERSON: C.K. Mahajan, Vipin Sanduja, Registrar, Delhi High Court, Anr, Delhi Law 114, L. Chandrakumar v. Union, Anr, Vipin Sanduja, Registrar, Delhi High Court, Anr, Anr, Kumar Sheth, Anr, Anr, N.C. Singhal, Vipin Sanduja, Registrar, Delhi High Court, Anr

NORP: J.1

ORDINAL: second, second, first, first, first, second

ORG: Commerce, Civil Services Examination, Commerce, the Union Public Service Commission, UPSC, the State of Madhya Pradesh, Commerce, Reliance, Court, Parent Forum, Central Board of Secondary Education, Board, UPSC, Reliance, Court, the Supreme Court, Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission, UPSC, Reliance, Court, Court, the Administrative Tribunal Act.6, the Apex Court, AIR 1997, Reliance, Court, Nighal Parveen, Ms., v. Union of India and, Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal, Maharashtra State Board of Secondary, Paritosh Bhupesh, the Central Administrative Tribunal(1, the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Supreme Court, All-India Service, -(i, All-India Service, an All-India Service, an All-India Service, State, the Government of India, a State Government, the Central Government, The Central Government, the Government of India, State, the Central Government, the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Supreme Court, and(b, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Industrial Tribunal, Labour Court, Administrative Tribunals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Clauses, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sections 14, Tribunal, the Allahabad High Court, Sudhanshu Tripathi v. Union of India, IAS Recruitment Examination, Court, Court, Civil Services, Indian Administrative Service, the Government Counsel, the High Court, Court, All India Service, the Administrative Tribunal, the Orissa High Court, the Administrative Tribunal, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, K. Naga Raja and Ors, Superintending Engineering, Irrigation Department, Tribunal, the High Court, an All India Service, All India Services, the Indian Administrative Service, the Union Public Service Commission, NighalParveen, Court, the Administrative Tribunal Act 1985, the Central Government, the Central Government, State, the Government of India, the Civil Service Examination, Administrative Tribunal, Central Administrative Tribunal, Court, UPSC, Court, Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission, UPSC

CARDINAL: 2001.2, one, four, five, 1, 1, 1, 85(2000)DLT471, 2, 362, 1, 28, 2, 769, 85(2000)DLT471, 1985]1SCR29, 28, 3, 1, 28, two, 1, 1, 28, 2, 28, 28, 1 to 3

DATE: 20th May, 2001, 24th August, 2001, 9th April, 2002, another, 1997, 1989, 1985, 1996, that day, 1947, 14 of 1947, 1.11.1985, 1988, 1985, 1985, 1987, '13, 1985, 1985, 1985, '14

MONEY: 75 marks

QUANTITY: 10-1-2 Higher

PERCENT: 72%

GPE: Delhi, India, India, Clause, Orissa, Clause, India

TIME: under this Act

FAC: Pratap Chandra Rout

PRODUCT: 104