Mr. Akshay Kapur and ors. Vs. Mr. Rishav Kapur and ors.

Decided On : May-30-2003

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 8, Section 5, Section 8, Section 8, the Clause 4 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU, Section 8, the Arbitration Act 1940, Section 7(3, Section 7, Section 5 of the Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act 1940, Section 5, Section 8, Section 20 and Section 34 of the 1940 Act, Section 8 and of Section 34, Section 34, Section 8, Section 34, Section 34 of the 1940 Act, Section 34, Section 8 of the 1996 Act, Section 8(1, Section 8(3, Section 16 of the 1996 Act, Section 5, Section 8, Section 11, Section 8, Section 20 of the 1940 Act, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, Section 41(b, Section 20 of the 1940 Act, Section 9 or Section 17, Section 8, Section 20 of the 1940 Act, Section 20 of the 1940 Act, Section 11, Section 9, Section 9 Arbitral, Section 21 of the Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 21, Section 9, Section 36 of the Act, Section 8, Section 8, Section 34, Section 5, Section 16 of the 1996 Act, Section 8, Section 28, the Indian Contract Act

PERSON: Vikramajit Sen, A.M. Singhvi, Shri K.N. Memani, Shri K.N. Memani, K.N. Memani's, Singhvi, Award, Singhvi, Order, M.A. Khan, Sundaram, Sundaram, Sundaram, Arun Kapur, Arun Kapur, Memani, MoU, Memani, Arun Kapur, Valuer, Arun Kapur, Sundaram, MoU, Arun Kapur, Atlas Cycles, Sundaram, Sundaram, Northern Railway, Sarvesh Chopra, P.N. Djakarta Lloyd, Singhvi, Comp Cas, Miheer H. Mafatlal, Order XXXIX CPC, Kalpana Kothari, Sudha Yadav and Others, Model Law, Kothari, Singhvi, P.V.G. Raju, Award, Shri K.N. Memani, Shri K.N. Memani, Shri K.N. Memani, Arun Kapur, Jaidev Kapur, K.N. Memani, K.N. Memani's, Ganju, Kapur, Kapur, K.N.

DATE: 1441/2003, 1996, 338/2003, 14.1.2003, August 2000, 1996, 8, 16, 13239/2002, 29.7.2002, January, 2003, March, 2001, 9.4.2001, the day, 1940, 1995, 1996, '8, 1996, 1940, 1940, 14, 2377/2003, 2377/2003

ORG: Suit No, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Defendants, the Final Valuation Report, Messrs Ernst & Young Private Ltd., Defendant No. 10, Companies, Messrs Ernest & Young, the Companies/Firms/Trusts, un, Plaintiff, Messrs Ernst & Young, Plaintiff, The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Civil Courts, Sections 5, Plaintiff, Malanpur, the Valuation Report, Plaintiff, Court, the Evaluation Report, the Arbitration Clause, the Arbitration Agreement, the Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Messrs Ernst & Young, the Arbitration Clause, Defendants, Atlas Industries, the Joint Managing Committee, the Board of Directors of, Atlas Industries, the Joint Managing Committee, Atlas Cycles Industries Limited, Roamer Engineering Works Limited, Arbitration, Messrs Ernst & Young, the Board of Directors, Arbitrator, MoU, Board, Plaintiff, Messrs Ernst & Young, S.R. Batliboi & Company, The Valuation Report, Plaintiff, E&Y, Group, Group, Group, Group, Group, Group, Group, Group, Gaya Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Asiatic Shipping Co., Private) Ltd., Hindustan Lever Employees' Union, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Mafatlal Industries Ltd., The Apex Court, The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, inter alia, inter alia, Court, the Arbitral Tribunals, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Judicial, the Judicial Authority, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sections, Courts, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, M/s. NEPC India Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The High Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Court, the Arbitration Clause, P. Anand Gajapathi Raju, Court, Plaintiff, MoU, Clauses 6, Shri A.M. Ahmedi, the Supreme Court of India, Charitable Trusts, MOU, MOU, Arbitration, Arbitrator under Section 17, Replies, the Terms of the Memorandum of Understanding, M/s Ernst and Young, the Valuation Report, Arbitration, Arbitration, Valuation Report, Arbitrator

CARDINAL: 77/2003 1, 8, 9, 388/2003, 3, 8.1.1999, three, three, about fifty, 37, 10.5.2002, 9,00,00,000/-, 4, 12, 34, three, three, three, 10 and 11, three, three, 4.4.2001, 13.10.2001, 9.4.2001, 10.4.2001, 545.0, 500.3, 194.6, 850.7, 5., three, 2002]2SCR156, three, 1953]4SCR572, 83, 30, two, two, 9, 20 and 34, two, one, 1999]1SCR89, two, one, 10, 12, 2000]2SCR684, 13, 4, 10, three, three, three, three, three, three, three, three, two, 14, three, 15, 10 and 11, three, three, 389/2003, 18, 8.7.2003

PRODUCT: the 'Act', Report, Report, Valuers, Report

WORK_OF_ART: Orders, the Second Schedule, The Memorandum of Understanding, The Memorandum of Understanding

NORP: Hon'ble

PERCENT: 50.2%

ORDINAL: 36th, third, firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, first, 33rd

GPE: Bihar, Smt, New Delhi, Suit No

EVENT: Section 7(3

FAC: the Sole Arbitrator, Reply