Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Ratan and Co. Vs. P. Narayanan
Decided On : Apr-22-1975
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 21, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21, Fao 28 of 1968, Section 109(2, Rule 56, Section 21, Section 109(2, Section 109(2, Section 109(2, Section 21(1, Section 21 of the Act, Section 101, Section 21.26, Section 101(2, Section 101.28, Section 109(2, Section 97(c).29
CARDINAL: 1, two, 6, 1967.3, two, two, One, 28, 1968.12, two, 202, 1964]1SCR717, 1967]1SCR310, 273, two, 1, 27, 1, 101(2, 200/-
ORDINAL: 5th, 5th, Firstly, Secondly, second, Firstly, Secondly, 11th
DATE: October, 1966, 238044, 1st September, 30th November 1967, one month, 2nd December, 1967, 11th December, 1967, 18th December, 1967, the period of three months, 1958, 23rd December, 1967, one month, 8th January, 1968, 1968, April, 1968, 8th January, 1968, one month's, 86 of 1968, three months, one month, 1958, 1966, 86 of 1968, '22, one month
ORG: Rattan & Co., the Trade Marks Journal, Registry, Registry, Registry, instructions.8, Registrar, Act.10, Registrar, Court, Registrar, Registrar, the Supreme Court, The Delhi Rent Control Act, the Supreme Court, Central Bank of India Ltd., The Supreme Court, Central Bank, Registrar, the Trade and Merchandise Rules, S. C. Sharma & Co., Registrar, Act.18, Registrar, Legislature, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, the Trade Mark Registry
PERSON: Jainson, R. P. Locks Co., Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Anoop Singh, K. G. Bansal, Registrar, Shanker Lal Aggarwal V. Shanker Lal Poddar, Gokal Chand, Anoop Singh, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar
GPE: Delhi, TM-44.5, Okhla
PRODUCT: TM-44, TM-44, TM-44, Registrar, TM-44, TM-44, Form TM-44, TM-44, TM-44
NORP: Indian, Procedural, Illumine