Tarsem Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Decided On : Dec-12-2008

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 302, Section 304B, the Indian Penal Code, Section 304B, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 2, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 2, the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Evidence Act, the Indian Penal Code, Section 113B, the Evidence Act, Section 113B of the Evidence Act, Section 113B, the Indian Penal Code, Section 304B, Section 113B of the Evidence Act and, Section 113B, the Evidence Act and Section 304B IPC, Section 113B, the Evidence Act, Section 113B of the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 113B, the Evidence Act, the Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, Section 498A., Section 498A, Section 113A, Section 113A, the Evidence Act, Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 313, Section 106, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 304B of the Code.20, Section 386(b)(iii, Section 377 or Section 378, Section 113B of the Evidence Act, the Indian Penal Code and Section 113B, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 306 and Section 304B

ORG: S.B. Sinha, Army, Naik, the Canal Department, Exhibit PJ & PH, Gurumukhi, Gurumukhi, FIR, The High Court, High Court, FIR, State, FIR, FIR, Counsel, FIR, DW-1, the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat, Parliament, Court, the Law Commission of India, Parliament, Section 304B IPC, FIR, The High Court, Organo Phosphorus Compound, Endocel, Chemical, Endocel, Smt, Smt, Army, the High Court, Section 304B, Court, Section 304B IPC, Section 114 Illustration, Suffice, Section 498A IPC, Cruelty, Section 498A. Substantive Section 498A IPC, Sections 304B, Section 498A IPC, T. Aruntperunjothi, Court, PW-7, the High Court, the Public Prosecutor, the Appellate Court, Court, Section 304B, Section 304B, Court, Section 304B, Section 304B, the High Court, the Autopsy Surgeon, FIR

NORP: J.1, Harnam, and3, Indian

PERSON: Amriko, Jaura Kothi, Amriko, Tarsem Singh, Harnam Singh, Amriko, Amriko, Amriko, Tarsem Singh, Sukhwinder Singh, Amriko, Tarsem Singh, Amriko, Kaur, Manjit Kaur, Mohinder Singh, Tarsem Singh, Kaur, Manjit Kaur, Mohinder, Mahabir Singh, Kuldip Singh, Mahabir Singh, Kuldip Singh, Tarsem Singh, Harnam Singh, Parsin Kaur, Amriko, Amriko, Amriko, Niranjan Dass, Dowry Deaths, Law, Manjit Singh, Amriko, Kaur, Kaur, Tarsem Singh, Amriko, Ex, Tarsem Singh, Amriko, Tarsem Singh, 7 Sukhwinder Singh, Tarsem Singh, Harnam Singh, Tarsem Singh, Tarsem Singh, Tarsem Singh, Hira Lal, IPC, Akula Ravinder, Kuldip Singh, Anr

DATE: the year 1983, A few days, Ten days, a few days, the year 1983, 18.3.1987, seven years, 1961, less than seven years, seven years, 1961, 8-10 days, 1983, seven years, seven years, a period of, seven years, a few days, a few weeks

CARDINAL: two, one, One, four, 9, 10, 1, 28, 1961).(2, one, 45, two, 10-8-1988, one, three, two, 1, 2, 2003CriLJ3711, 498A, two, 2006CriLJ3290, 2006CriLJ554, 2001CriLJ4625, 643, 21, three, One, three, two, Three

LANGUAGE: English

TIME: 11.00 a.m., about 4.00 p.m.

QUANTITY: 1 cm x .5 cm, 3 cm x 2 cm

PRODUCT: Section 113B

GPE: Delhi, Counsel, Singh v. State of Punjab

ORDINAL: second, third, third, first