Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Labha Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Decided On : Apr-27-2007
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 304, Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 304 Part II, the Indian Penal Code, Section 300, the Indian Penal Code, Section 304, the Indian Penal Code
ORG: S.B. Sinha, ISKO, P.W. 4, P.W. 7, the Dehradun Police Station.3, the High Court, P.W. 4, peri cardium, The First Information Report, Reliance, Court, Court, P.W. 4, Suffice, P.W. 1 and, P.W. 4, Counsel, know.12
NORP: J.1
CARDINAL: One, 5, 31.10.1985, about 9, three, four, three, two, more than one, three, 2., 5, 3, 1, 2, 3, two, only one, two, one, three, 5, three, two, Two, 13, II
GPE: Multana, Multana
PERSON: Multana, MAIN ISKI, Whereupon Multana, Ranjeet, Amar Singh, Jeet Singh, Birsa Singh, Amar Singh, Vinay Singh, Birsa Singh, Birsa Singh, Ajay Krishna, Nos, Nos, Ranjeet, Multana, Appellant, Birsa Singh, Birsa Singh
TIME: 10.40 p.m.
LOC: appellant.5, case.9, Fourthly
QUANTITY: 4cm x 1 1/2cm, 100 ml, 6 cm, 1 1/2 cm, 2 1/2 cm X 1cm X 1cm, 5cm X 2cm X 7cm, 2cm, 5 cm, 5 cm
ORDINAL: 6th, first, first, first
PRODUCT: P.W. 2, P.W. 1, P.W. 4, P.W. 1, P.W. 7, P.W. 1
WORK_OF_ART: Palak Jhapakte'