Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ajay Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors

Decided On : Nov-27-2015

Court : Jharkhand

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Rule 36, Rule 34, the CISF Act, Rule 34, Rule 36

CARDINAL: 1, 2043, 2, 17.03.2009, one, 31.05.1999, one, 04.08.2008, two, One, 2, 17.03.2009, one, one, 3, four, two, 4 7, 14.07.2008, 8, 5 9

DATE: 2010, 2015, annual, 17.07.2009, 15.01.2010, the period of one year, 17.03.2009, 15.01.2010, 2003, one year, 2015, 14.10.1992, 1969, 21.09.2006, 2003, 2009, 15, 17.03.2009, 17.07.2009 and, 15.01.2010

PRODUCT: Ajay Kumar

WORK_OF_ART: Late Asharfi, Truck No

PERSON: Lal Sahu, Petitioner Versus 1, Niranjan Kumar, Binod Singh, J.:1, Bokaro, Niranjan Kumar, Binod Singh, Bokaro, Rule, Mohan Nath Sinha &, SCC310, Pramath Patnaik, J.

ORG: No.4/47, District-Bokaro, Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Union of India, Central Industrial Security Force, Central Industrial Security Force, Central Industrial Security Force, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro 5, Commandant/Administrator, Central Industrial Security Force Unit, Bokaro Steel Limited, CGC, Bokaro Steel Plant, no.1, no.2, no.5, Court, Court, CISF Rule 2001, CGC, I.A. No.1355, CISF, the Director General, CISF, CISF, no.2, Court, CISF Unit, CISF Rule 2001, Apex Court, State of Uttar Pradesh, the High Court, Apex Court

GPE: P.S., New Delhi, Boring Road, P.O., P.S., no.4, no.4, no.4, New Delhi, New Delhi

FAC: Lodhi Road

NORP: no.3, Sans, no.3

ORDINAL: second, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //