State of Up and Ors Vs. Ajay Kumar Sharma and Anr

Decided On : Nov-26-2015

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: a Division Bench, Section 24, Section 24 Cr, Section 25-A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 166(3, Article 13 of the Constitution of India, the Constitutional Bench, Article 14, the Constitution of India, the Allahabad Bench, Article 141, the Constitutional Bench, Article 21 of the Constitution and demand, the Constitution Bench, a Division Bench, a Division Bench, a Division Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, a Division Bench, Article 14, Article 14, Section 24

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, SLP, U.P. & Ors, C.A. No.13728 of 2015, District Government Counsel, the State of Uttar Pradesh, State, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, The High Court, District Government Counsel, the State Government, U.P. The Manual, inter alia, the District Magistrate, State, State Government, District Government Counsel, State, the District Magistrate, Respondents, District Government Counsel, The State Government’s Order, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, U.P. Shaskiya, U.P. Writ Petition Misc, the High Court, State, U.P. Writ Petition Misc, the High Court, U.P., Additional District Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, Sub District Government Counsel, U.P. Shaskiya, the State Government, State of U.P. & Ors, the State Government, Court, State Government, the High Court of Allahabad, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Courts, Court, Department of Law and Justice, Government, U.P., Writ Petition No.6069, U.P., the High Court, the State Government, The District Magistrates, the Civil, Criminal and Revenue, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Respondents, Ajay Kumar Sharma & Anr, Court, Order, Court, Order, the High Court, Ajay Kumar Sharma & Anr, U.P., Respondents, the State Government, The High Court, Government, Directorate of Prosecution, District Magistrates, District Government Counsel, The Learned Senior Counsel, Appellant/State, the High Court of Allahabad, Court, State, U.P., Executive, Court, Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of UP, State, Respondents, Government, State, UP Law Officers Association, Court, Standing Counsel and Government, the High Court of Allahabad, Respondents, Learned Senior Counsel, Respondents, State, Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi, Court, Court, State, the State Government, Respondents, Andi Mukta, Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India, Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi, ADGCs, State, Court, LR Manual, Order, Allahabad, Learned Senior Counsel, the State Government, UP, State, the State Government, the High Court, Time, Court, Stare Decisis, Bench, Court, Union of India, Doubt, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Bench, Court, Divisions of two, Vide Young, Bristol Aeroplane Co. Ltd., T.V., Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Divisions, Division, Court, Court, Court, Court, Division Benches, Court, Court, Acharya, Division Benches, Division, Union of India, Godfrey Philips India Ltd., Court, Jit Ram Shiv, U.P., Court, the Full Court, Court, Court, Division Benches, Court, Court, Court, Court, Judicial, Court, Court, Court, Court, Parija, Bench, Bench, SCC644 this Court in Government of Andhra Pradesh, Additional District Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, Sub District Government Counsel, State, U.P., Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi, Court, the LR Manual, District Counsel, the State Government, the State Government, Court, the State Government, District Counsel, the State Government, State, State, the District Counsel, the Constitutional Courts, State, the Public Prosecutor, the District Counsel, State, State, the Public Prosecutors, District Counsel, State, State, inter alia, State, Public Prosecutors, State, State, the Legal Remembrancer’s Manual, District Government Counsel, State, Judicial, State, Additional District Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, Sub District Government Counsel, State, State, Court, Additional District Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, Sub District Government Counsel, Government, The High Court, the State Government, THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.13727 OF2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP, U.P. & Ors, Respondent(s, Public Prosecutor/District Government Counsel, UP Government, Bench, State, U.P., Court, State of U.P. & Ors, Rakesh Kumar Keshari & Anr, Union of India & Ors, Keshav Kaushik & Ors, State of, U.P. & Ors, Court, Court, Bench, the High Court

DATE: 2014, 2015, 2012, 1975, August 2008, 2008, 2012, 2011, 2012, a period of, three months, today, 2012, 25.7.2012, 11.6.2012, 17.7.2012, 25.7.2012, 2012, a period of, four months, today, 2004, 1991, 1994, 46350, 2014, 39935, 2014, 2011, 1993, 1989, 2005, 2013, 4042-43, 2012, 1989, two years, a century, 2002, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2001, 44, 46, November 26, 2015, 1973, 2004, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, November 26, 2015

PERSON: Appellants Versus Ajay Kumar Sharma & Anr, J.1 Leave, Misc, Bench No.9127, Order, Lucknow Bench, Kalyan Samiti, Bench No.7851, Order, Order, Kalyan Samiti, Bench No.7825, Sadhna Sharma, Harsh Gupta, Harsh Gupta v. State, Bench No.9127, Kapil Sibal, Bench, Johri Mal, Johri Mal, Wednesbury, Sibal, Sibal, Ram Charan Singh Prajapati, Aman Lekhi, Johri Mal, Bench, Johri Mal, Kumar Keshri, Lekhi, A. R. Sircar v. State, Lekhi, Manoj Goel, Sadguru Shree Muktajee, V. R. Rudani, Lekhi, Guru Prasad, Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Kayan Samiti, Sharma, Common Law, Benches, Benches, Bench, Bench, William Butler Yeats, Raghubir Singh, Chinnappa Reddy, Javed Ahmed, Abdul Hamid Pawala v. State, Tamil Nadu, Javed Ahmed, Abdul Hamid Pawala Chinnapa Reddy, Sher Singh, Sher Singh, Division Benches, John Martin v. State, Saha, Bhut Nath Mate v. State, Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain, Beg, Bharati v. State, Sitaram Balvalkar v., Waman Shripad Mage, Mattulal, Radhe Lal, Anandprasadji Maharaj, Haryana, Bench, Bench, Chandra Prakash, Raghubir Singh’s, Raghubir Singh, Rooplal, A. P. Jaiswal, 14 Sitting, Bench, Johri Mal, Johri Mal, Johri Mal, Johri Mal, J.(VIKRAMAJIT SEN, Ajay Kumar Sharma & Anr, JUDGMENT Abhay, J.1, Vikramajit Sen, Johri Mal, Satyavrat Singh, Johri Mal, Johri Mal

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 4, more than 100, 30, 6.1.2012, 12.1.2012, 2011, three, 6, 5.9.2012, 13.11.2013, 8, Three, 4, 1, 2, 9, Two, 5, 2, 4, 3, 10, 11, 12, 2, two, three, two, three, two, three, larger than two, three, two, five, three, five, two, five, thirteen, four, three, two, two, one, two, two, 13, 5, 4, 22, 4, two, three, three, three, three, five, 1, 1, two, Three, 4, 15, Two, 41, 2, 75, 16, 17, three, 4, 5, 3, 5, 14, three, 15, 40

PRODUCT: Appellant, Judgments, Certiorari, Respondent, Certiorari, Guru Prasad v. State, Bench, Sadhna Sharma, Bench, a Full Bench, Maharajshri, Judgment

GPE: P.C., LCD1066, P.C., the District Judges, Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi, Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi, Prajapati, Judges, T.V., Vatheeswaran v. State, Sher, Singh v. State of Punjab, Judges, Triveniben v. State, Gujarat, Judges, India, the United States, India, Judges, India, Judges, Haradhan, Kesavananda, Kerala, Ganapati, Judges, Judges, Gujarat, Judges, Kumar v. State, Motilal, Judges, India, Judges, Judges, Judges, Judges, Kumar v. Union of India, New Delhi, P.C., New Delhi

FAC: Bishan Pal Saxena v. State

NORP: Sadhna Sharma, Mandamus, Mandamus, Mandamus, Rules, Mandamus

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, second

WORK_OF_ART: the Writ Petitions, Order of this Court, Bench, 'The Second Coming', Applying Sub-Inspector, "Stare Decisis

LOC: LR Manual, Executive, T.V. Vatheeswaran

MONEY: to44